Signal-To-Noise Ratio

"Signal-To-Noise Ratio" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

The comparison of the quantity of meaningful data to the irrelevant or incorrect data.

Descriptor ID	D059629
MeSH Number(s)	E05.318.740.872.875 E05.318.780.800.875 G17.800.500 N05.715.360.750.725.750 N05.715.360.780.700.840 N06.850.520.445.800.875 N06.850.520.830.872.750
Concept/Terms	Signal-To-Noise Ratio Signal-To-Noise Ratio Ratio, Signal-To-Noise Ratios, Signal-To-Noise Signal To Noise Ratio Signal-To-Noise Ratios

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Signal-To-Noise Ratio".

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E]
Investigative Techniques [E05]
Epidemiologic Methods [E05.318]
Statistics as Topic [E05.318.740]
Sensitivity and Specificity [E05.318.740.872]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [E05.318.740.872.875]
Epidemiologic Research Design [E05.318.780]
Sensitivity and Specificity [E05.318.780.800]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [E05.318.780.800.875]
Biological Sciences [G]
Mathematical Concepts [G17]
Sensitivity and Specificity [G17.800]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [G17.800.500]
Health Care [N]
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation [N05]
Quality of Health Care [N05.715]
Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms [N05.715.360]
Statistics as Topic [N05.715.360.750]
Sensitivity and Specificity [N05.715.360.750.725]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [N05.715.360.750.725.750]
Epidemiologic Research Design [N05.715.360.780]
Sensitivity and Specificity [N05.715.360.780.700]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [N05.715.360.780.700.840]
Environment and Public Health [N06]
Public Health [N06.850]
Epidemiologic Methods [N06.850.520]
Epidemiologic Research Design [N06.850.520.445]
Sensitivity and Specificity [N06.850.520.445.800]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [N06.850.520.445.800.875]
Statistics as Topic [N06.850.520.830]
Sensitivity and Specificity [N06.850.520.830.872]
Signal-To-Noise Ratio [N06.850.520.830.872.750]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is related to "Signal-To-Noise Ratio".

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Signal-To-Noise Ratio".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Signal-To-Noise Ratio" by people in this website by year, and whether "Signal-To-Noise Ratio" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 42 publications over 12 distinct years, with a maximum of 9 publications in 2015

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2011	0	2	2
2012	0	4	4
2013	0	2	2
2014	0	4	4
2015	1	8	9
2016	0	7	7
2017	0	4	4
2018	0	4	4
2019	0	2	2
2020	0	1	1
2021	0	1	1
2022	0	2	2

Below are the most recent publications written about "Signal-To-Noise Ratio" by people in Profiles.

Ryan DB, Eckert MA, Sellers EW, Schairer KS, McBee MT, Jones MR, Smith SL. Impact of Effortful Word Recognition on Supportive Neural Systems Measured by Alpha and Theta Power. Ear Hear. 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1549-1562.

View in: PubMed
Vaden KI, Teubner-Rhodes S, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR, Eckert MA. Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise. Neuroimage. 2022 06; 253:119042.

View in: PubMed
Varga-Szemes A, Emrich T. Another step to bring artificial intelligence closer to clinical application - noise reduction for late gadolinium enhancement. Int J Cardiol. 2021 12 15; 345:150-151.

View in: PubMed
Yin WH, Yu YT, Zhang Y, An YQ, Hou ZH, Gao Y, Wang HP, Lu B, De Santis D, Rollins JD, Schoepf UJ. Contrast medium injection protocols for coronary CT angiography: should contrast medium volumes be tailored to body weight or body surface area? Clin Radiol. 2020 05; 75(5):395.e17-395.e24.

View in: PubMed
McClaskey CM, Dias JW, Harris KC. Sustained envelope periodicity representations are associated with speech-in-noise performance in difficult listening conditions for younger and older adults. J Neurophysiol. 2019 10 01; 122(4):1685-1696.

View in: PubMed
Bologna WJ, Vaden KI, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):EL173.

View in: PubMed
Wiacek A, Rindal OMH, Falomo E, Myers K, Fabrega-Foster K, Harvey S, Lediju Bell MA. Robust Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging of Breast Ultrasound Data: Initial Clinical Results. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 03; 66(3):527-540.

View in: PubMed
De Santis D, Caruso D, Schoepf UJ, Eid M, Albrecht MH, Duguay TM, Varga-Szemes A, Laghi A, De Cecco CN. Contrast media injection protocol optimization for dual-energy coronary CT angiography: results from a circulation phantom. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3473-3481.

View in: PubMed
De Cecco CN, Caruso D, Schoepf UJ, De Santis D, Muscogiuri G, Albrecht MH, Meinel FG, Wichmann JL, Burchett PF, Varga-Szemes A, Sheafor DH, Hardie AD. A noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm improves the diagnostic accuracy of late hepatic arterial phase dual-energy CT for the detection of hypervascular liver lesions. Eur Radiol. 2018 Aug; 28(8):3393-3404.

View in: PubMed
Albrecht MH, Bickford MW, Schoepf UJ, Tesche C, De Santis D, Eid M, Jacobs BE, Duguay TM, Schmidt BT, Canstein C, Varga-Szemes A, Leithner D, Martin S, Vogl TJ, De Cecco CN. Beam-hardening in 70-kV Coronary CT angiography: Artifact reduction using an advanced post-processing algorithm. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Apr; 101:111-117.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals