Human Experimentation

"Human Experimentation" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus, MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure, which enables searching at various levels of specificity.

MeSH information

Definition | Details | More General Concepts | Related Concepts | More Specific Concepts

The use of humans as investigational subjects.

Descriptor ID	D006805
MeSH Number(s)	E05.445 H01.770.644.145.365
Concept/Terms	Human Experimentation Human Experimentation Experimentation, Human Human Research Subject Protection Human Research Subject Protection

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Human Experimentation".

Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E]
Investigative Techniques [E05]
Human Experimentation [E05.445]
Natural Sciences [H]
Natural Science Disciplines [H01]
Science [H01.770]
Research [H01.770.644]
Biomedical Research [H01.770.644.145]
Human Experimentation [H01.770.644.145.365]

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is related to "Human Experimentation".

Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Human Experimentation".

publications

Timeline | Most Recent

This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Human Experimentation" by people in this website by year, and whether "Human Experimentation" was a major or minor topic of these publications.

Bar chart showing 15 publications over 8 distinct years, with a maximum of 3 publications in 2004 and 2006

To see the data from this visualization as text, click here.

Year	Major Topic	Minor Topic	Total
2002	2	0	2
2003	1	0	1
2004	2	1	3
2005	1	1	2
2006	2	1	3
2008	1	0	1
2014	1	1	2
2018	0	1	1

Below are the most recent publications written about "Human Experimentation" by people in Profiles.

Sonne S, Gentilin S, Sampson RR, Bell L, Mauney T, Young S, Bright K, Flume P. Response to Commentary: Regulatory Support Improves Subsequent IRB Approval Rates in Studies Initially Deemed Not Ready for Review-A CTSA Institution's Experience. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 04; 13(2):148.

View in: PubMed
MacCubbin P, Moore JB. The role of the institutional review board in public health research: the position of the Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jul-Aug; 20(4):365-7.

View in: PubMed
Neely JG, Paniello RC, Graboyes EM, Sharon JD, Grindler DJ, Nussenbaum B. Practical guide to understanding clinical research compliance. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 May; 150(5):716-21.

View in: PubMed
Arford PH, Knowles MB, Sneed NV. Competent human research personnel. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2008 Dec; 39(12):565-8.

View in: PubMed
Benedict S, Georges JM. Nurses and the sterilization experiments of Auschwitz: a postmodernist perspective. Nurs Inq. 2006 Dec; 13(4):277-88.

View in: PubMed
Sade RM. Reports of clinical trials: ethical aspects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Aug; 132(2):245-6.

View in: PubMed
Block MI, Khitin LM, Sade RM. Ethical process in human research published in thoracic surgery journals. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jul; 82(1):6-11; discussion 11-2.

View in: PubMed
Grubaugh AL, Frueh BC, Magruder KM. Research participants and questions about sexual trauma. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Sep; 162(9):1757-8.

View in: PubMed
Bravo G, Gagnon M, Wildeman S, Marshall DT, Pâquet M, Dubois MF. Comparison of provincial and territorial legislation governing substitute consent for research. Can J Aging. 2005; 24(3):237-50.

View in: PubMed
Popp RJ, Smith SC, Adams RJ, Antman EM, Kavey RE, DeMaria AN, Ohman EM, Pitt B, Willerson JT, Bellande BJ, Fonarow GC, Nishimura RA, Shah PM, Hirshfeld JW, Messer JV, Peterson ED, Prystowsky EN, Anderson JL, Cheitlin MD, Goldstein LB, Grant AO, Beller GA, Hines EF, Livingston DW, McEntree CW. ACCF/AHA consensus conference report on professionalism and ethics. Circulation. 2004 Oct 19; 110(16):2506-49.

View in: PubMed

People

Explore

Similar Concepts

Top Journals