Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Carlo De Cecco and Rozemarijn Vliegenthart.
Connection Strength
1.263
-
Machine Learning and Deep Neural Networks Applications in Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Perfusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S58-S65.
Score: 0.190
-
Iodine quantification based on rest / stress perfusion dual energy CT to differentiate ischemic, infarcted and normal myocardium. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Mar; 112:136-143.
Score: 0.174
-
Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
Score: 0.144
-
Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
Score: 0.139
-
Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jul; 205(1):W67-72.
Score: 0.136
-
The Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography: A year in review 2021. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022 May-Jun; 16(3):266-276.
Score: 0.054
-
Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
Score: 0.045
-
Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
Score: 0.043
-
Feasibility of extracellular volume quantification using dual-energy CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jan - Feb; 13(1):81-84.
Score: 0.043
-
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
Score: 0.040
-
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
Score: 0.039
-
Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT?Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 10; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124.
Score: 0.038
-
Effect of inversion time on the precision of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement quantification evaluated with synthetic inversion recovery MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug; 27(8):3235-3243.
Score: 0.038
-
Accuracy and Radiation Dose Reduction Using Low-Voltage Computed Tomography Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring With Tin Filtration. Am J Cardiol. 2017 02 15; 119(4):675-680.
Score: 0.037
-
Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
Score: 0.036
-
Myocardial Late Gadolinium Enhancement: Accuracy of T1 Mapping-based Synthetic Inversion-Recovery Imaging. Radiology. 2016 Feb; 278(2):374-82.
Score: 0.034
-
Mammographic detection of breast arterial calcification as an independent predictor of coronary atherosclerotic disease in a single ethnic cohort of African American women. Atherosclerosis. 2015 Sep; 242(1):218-21.
Score: 0.034