Connection

Daniel Steinberg to Predictive Value of Tests

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Steinberg has written about Predictive Value of Tests.
Daniel Steinberg
Connection Strength
0.418
Predictive Value of Tests
  1. Vulnerable plaque imaging-current techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Mar; 2(1):9-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  2. Role of Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure Saturation During Right Heart Catheterization: A Prospective Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 11; 13(11):e007981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  3. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  4. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  5. Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling. Radiology. 2018 Jul; 288(1):64-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  6. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  8. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec; 9(6):546-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. Coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve measurements--initial experience with a novel physician-driven algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2015 Apr; 25(4):1201-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  11. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 01; 114(9):1303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  12. Ultra-low-dose intra-arterial contrast injection for iliofemoral computed tomographic angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Dec; 2(12):1404-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  13. Prognostic value of the Syntax score in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):612-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  14. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions in contemporary practice. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Feb; 102(2):143-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  15. The predictive value of computed tomography calcium scores: a comparison with quantitative volumetric intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Jan-Mar; 10(1):30-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  16. Five-year outcomes of moderate or ambiguous left main coronary artery disease and the intravascular ultrasound predictors of events. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Dec; 20(12):635-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.