Connection

Daniel Steinberg to Severity of Illness Index

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Steinberg has written about Severity of Illness Index.
Connection Strength

0.379
  1. Vulnerable plaque imaging-current techniques. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2009 Mar; 2(1):9-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  2. Five-year outcomes of moderate or ambiguous left main coronary artery disease and the intravascular ultrasound predictors of events. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Dec; 20(12):635-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  3. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  4. Relation of Lymphangiogenic Factor Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D to Elevated Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure. Am J Cardiol. 2019 09 01; 124(5):756-762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  5. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  6. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  7. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  9. Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec; 9(6):546-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Impact of aortic valve calcification on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the prospective multicenter German TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(2):348-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  11. Prognostic value of the Syntax score in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):612-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  12. Clinical presentation and outcome of patients hospitalized for symptomatic in-stent restenosis treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Mar; 102(3):209-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions in contemporary practice. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Feb; 102(2):143-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  14. The predictive value of computed tomography calcium scores: a comparison with quantitative volumetric intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Jan-Mar; 10(1):30-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  15. Impact of "nuisance" bleeding on clopidogrel compliance in patients undergoing intracoronary drug-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 15; 102(12):1614-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  16. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound to contrast-enhanced 64-slice computed tomography to assess the significance of angiographically ambiguous coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Oct 15; 102(8):994-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. Comparison between sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in complex patient and lesions subsets. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug 01; 70(2):167-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.