Donald Castell to Esophageal Motility Disorders
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Donald Castell has written about Esophageal Motility Disorders.
Connection Strength
9.807
-
"Presbyesophagus" No! Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 06 01; 116(6):1351-1352.
Score: 0.723
-
Characteristics of Consecutive Esophageal Motility Diagnoses After a Decade of Change. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr; 50(4):301-6.
Score: 0.505
-
Ineffective Esophageal Motility (IEM): the Old-New Frontier in Esophagology. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jan; 18(1):1.
Score: 0.496
-
Minor Motility Defects? Perhaps, but What About a True "Functional" Assessment? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Mar; 14(3):481.
Score: 0.491
-
Viscous impedance is an important indicator of abnormal esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Jul; 25(7):563-e455.
Score: 0.412
-
The evolution of achalasia. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Mar; 57(3):597-8.
Score: 0.375
-
Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov-Dec; 45(10):862-6.
Score: 0.372
-
High resolution manometry: a word of caution. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct; 103(10):2657-8.
Score: 0.300
-
An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81.
Score: 0.297
-
Impedance detected abnormal bolus transit in patients with normal esophageal manometry. Sensitive indicator of esophageal functional abnormality? Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21(6):563-9.
Score: 0.295
-
Revised criterion for diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility is associated with more frequent dysphagia and greater bolus transit abnormalities. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar; 103(3):699-704.
Score: 0.288
-
Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug; 42(8):917-22.
Score: 0.277
-
Bethanechol improves smooth muscle function in patients with severe ineffective esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr; 41(4):366-70.
Score: 0.271
-
Technology review: Esophageal impedance monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jan; 102(1):187-94.
Score: 0.264
-
Clinical relevance of the nutcracker esophagus: suggested revision of criteria for diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul; 40(6):504-9.
Score: 0.257
-
Successful use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors to control symptomatic esophageal hypercontractility: a case report. Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Nov; 50(11):2059-62.
Score: 0.245
-
Disposable balloon-based oesophageal motility catheters: comparison with solid-state transducers. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005 Jun; 17(3):453-7.
Score: 0.238
-
Multichannel intraluminal impedance: general principles and technical issues. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005 Apr; 15(2):257-64.
Score: 0.236
-
Esophageal function testing: role of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005 Apr; 15(2):265-75.
Score: 0.236
-
Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun; 99(6):1011-9.
Score: 0.222
-
Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Mar; 2(3):230-6.
Score: 0.219
-
Are 10 wet swallows an appropriate sample of esophageal motility? Yes and no. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan; 38(1):30-4.
Score: 0.216
-
Effect of different swallow time intervals on the nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan; 98(1):40-5.
Score: 0.202
-
Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001 Jul; 49(1):145-51.
Score: 0.182
-
Esophageal manometry prior to antireflux surgery: required, preferred, or even needed? Gastroenterology. 2001 Jul; 121(1):214-6.
Score: 0.182
-
Oesophageal motility defects associated with nocturnal gastro-oesophageal reflux on proton pump inhibitors. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 Nov; 13(11):1467-71.
Score: 0.162
-
Ineffective esophageal motility: the most common motility abnormality in patients with GERD-associated respiratory symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun; 94(6):1464-7.
Score: 0.157
-
Esophageal manometry and modern medicine. Dig Dis. 1998 Jul-Aug; 16(4):189-91.
Score: 0.148
-
Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM): the primary finding in patients with nonspecific esophageal motility disorder. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Sep; 42(9):1859-65.
Score: 0.139
-
Utility of Esophagram versus High-Resolution Manometry in the Detection of Esophageal Dysmotility. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 05; 154(5):888-91.
Score: 0.125
-
Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of?and?Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr; 14(4):526-534.e1.
Score: 0.122
-
Diagnosis of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Esophageal Pressure Topography vs. Conventional Line Tracing. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul; 110(7):967-77; quiz 978.
Score: 0.119
-
Ambulatory esophageal manometry in the evaluation of unexplained chest pain. Dig Dis. 1995 May-Jun; 13(3):145-52.
Score: 0.118
-
The nutcracker and the ostrich. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Aug; 88(8):1287-8.
Score: 0.105
-
Characterization of patients with low baseline impedance on multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH reflux testing. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug; 46(7):e55-7.
Score: 0.098
-
Esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal symptoms. Dysphagia. 1992; 7(1):1-2.
Score: 0.094
-
Esophageal motility disorders and chest pain. Med Clin North Am. 1991 Sep; 75(5):1045-63.
Score: 0.092
-
Nonacid reflux episodes reaching the pharynx are important factors associated with cough. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 May-Jun; 43(5):414-9.
Score: 0.078
-
The effect of oral buspirone, pyridostigmine, and bethanechol on esophageal function evaluated with combined multichannel esophageal impedance-manometry in healthy volunteers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar; 43(3):253-60.
Score: 0.077
-
Chest pain of esophageal origin. Dig Dis. 1989; 7(1):39-50.
Score: 0.076
-
Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 May; 53(5):1198-205.
Score: 0.070
-
Gastrointestinal disorders in the elderly. Compr Ther. 1997 May; 23(5):349-59.
Score: 0.034
-
Perspectives on esophageal manometry: "lumpers versus splitters". Gastroenterology. 1995 Dec; 109(6):2053-5.
Score: 0.031
-
Chest pain of undetermined origin. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Oct; 4(4):731-46.
Score: 0.028
-
Esophageal function in systemic sclerosis: a prospective evaluation of motility and acid reflux in 36 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Jun; 88(6):870-6.
Score: 0.026
-
Cerebral potentials evoked by oesophageal distension in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Gut. 1992 Mar; 33(3):298-302.
Score: 0.024
-
Diltiazem therapy for symptoms associated with nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 Mar; 86(3):272-6.
Score: 0.022
-
Edrophonium provocative test in noncardiac chest pain. Evaluation of testing techniques. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Dec; 35(12):1445-51.
Score: 0.022
-
Hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter: what does it mean? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989 Apr; 11(2):139-46.
Score: 0.019
-
Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Jan 01; 110(1):66-78.
Score: 0.019