Connection

Etta Pisano to Quality Control

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Quality Control.
Connection Strength

0.268
  1. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  2. Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):864-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  3. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality. Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  4. Educational outreach to mammography facility staff to assist with compliance with the Mammography Quality Standards Act in rural North Carolina. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jul; 5(7):485-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  5. A formal curriculum in breast imaging for radiology residents. Invest Radiol. 1993 Aug; 28(8):762-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  6. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  7. Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. Med Phys. 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. Med Phys. 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):722-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.