Connection

Heather Evans to Surgical Wound Infection

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heather Evans has written about Surgical Wound Infection.
Heather Evans
Connection Strength
7.123
Surgical Wound Infection
  1. Identification of Important Features in Mobile Health Applications for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):530-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.582
  2. Engaging Patients in Co-Design of Mobile Health Tools for Surgical Site Infection Surveillance: Implications for Research and Implementation. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):535-540.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.581
  3. Patient-Generated Health Data in Surgical Site Infection: Changing Clinical Workflow and Care Delivery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):571-576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.579
  4. Executive Summary of the Assessing Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Technologies (ASSIST) Project. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):527-529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.577
  5. A Pilot Use of Patient-Generated Wound Data to Improve Postdischarge Surgical Site Infection Monitoring. JAMA Surg. 2017 06 01; 152(6):595-596.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.498
  6. Diagnosing Surgical Site Infection Using Wound Photography: A Scenario-Based Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 01; 224(1):8-15.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.477
  7. Proportion of Surgical Site Infections Occurring after Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Oct; 17(5):510-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  8. A Prognostic Model of Surgical Site Infection Using Daily Clinical Wound Assessment. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 08; 223(2):259-270.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  9. Patient perspectives on post-discharge surgical site infections: towards a patient-centered mobile health solution. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e114016.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  10. Preventing bacterial resistance in surgical patients. Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Apr; 89(2):501-19, x.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  11. Patient and Provider Preferences for Monitoring Surgical Wounds Using an mHealth App: A Formative Qualitative Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Mar; 23(2):168-173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  12. Applying Implementation Science in Surgical Infection Quality Improvement. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Aug; 22(6):635-639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  13. Technological Advances in Clinical Definition and Surveillance Methodology for Surgical Site Infection Incorporating Surgical Site Imaging and Patient-Generated Health Data. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):541-545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  14. Artificial Intelligence Methods for Surgical Site Infection: Impacts on Detection, Monitoring, and Decision Making. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):546-554.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  15. A Roadmap for Automatic Surgical Site Infection Detection and Evaluation Using User-Generated Incision Images. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):555-565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  16. A Stakeholder-Driven Framework for Evaluating Surgical Site Infection Surveillance Technologies. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2019 Oct; 20(7):588-591.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  17. Evaluation of Wound Photography for Remote Postoperative Assessment of Surgical Site Infections. JAMA Surg. 2019 02 01; 154(2):117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  18. Surgical site infection-the next frontier in global surgery. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 05; 18(5):477-478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  19. Wound Concerns and Healthcare Consumption of Resources after Colorectal Surgery: An Opportunity for Innovation? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Jul; 18(5):634-640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  20. Prognostics of surgical site infections using dynamic health data. J Biomed Inform. 2017 01; 65:22-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  21. Patients with Risk Factors for Complications Do Not Require Longer Antimicrobial Therapy for Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection. Am Surg. 2016 Sep; 82(9):860-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  22. A patient-centered system in a provider-centered world: challenges of incorporating post-discharge wound data into practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 05; 23(3):514-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  23. Design Considerations for Post-Acute Care mHealth: Patient Perspectives. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2014:1920-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  24. Comparative effectiveness of skin antiseptic agents in reducing surgical site infections: a report from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Mar; 218(3):336-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  25. Inflammation and the host response to injury, a Large-Scale Collaborative Project: patient-oriented research core standard operating procedures for clinical care IX. Definitions for complications of clinical care of critically injured patients. J Trauma. 2009 Aug; 67(2):384-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  26. Choosing antibiotics for intra-abdominal infections: what do we mean by "high risk"? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2009 Feb; 10(1):29-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  27. Single-institutional experience with the surgical infection prevention project in intra-abdominal surgery. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2007 Aug; 8(4):425-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  28. Comparison of fungal and nonfungal infections in a broad-based surgical patient population. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005; 6(1):55-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  29. Surgical Infection Society Guidelines: 2022 Updated Guidelines for Antibiotic Use in Open Extremity Fractures. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Nov; 23(9):817-828.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  30. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 05 21; 372(21):1996-2005.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.