Connection

J. Van Dorsten to Infant, Newborn

This is a "connection" page, showing publications J. Van Dorsten has written about Infant, Newborn.
Connection Strength

0.215
  1. Effect of fetal presentation on the amniotic fluid index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1222-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  2. A selective aggressive approach to the neonate exposed to meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Aug; 175(2):296-301; discussion 301-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  3. Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug; 211(2):147.e1-147.e16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  4. Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov; 209(5):446.e1-446.e30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  5. Intrapartum management of category II fetal heart rate tracings: towards standardization of care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug; 209(2):89-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in nulliparas with cervical length less than 30 mm. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov; 207(5):390.e1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  7. Preterm rupture of the membranes: combination therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep 15; 153(2):147-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  8. Perinatal outcomes in women with preterm rupture of membranes between 24 and 32 weeks of gestation and a history of vaginal bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jul; 193(1):164-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  9. The preterm prediction study: elevated cervical ferritin levels at 22 to 24 weeks of gestation are associated with spontaneous preterm delivery in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar; 186(3):458-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  10. Spacing the injection interval with paracervical block: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Dec; 58(6):696-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  11. Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Oct 15; 141(4):417-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  12. Fetal heart rate changes after accidental intrauterine lidocaine. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Feb; 57(2):257-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  13. Safety of labor epidural anesthesia for women with severe hypertensive disease. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1096-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: antenatal predictors of neonatal survival and morbidity in extremely low birth weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar; 180(3 Pt 1):665-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb; 88(2):233-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes. A randomized controlled trial. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. JAMA. 1997 Sep 24; 278(12):989-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Obstetric determinants of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 May; 176(5):960-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. The preterm prediction study: risk factors in twin gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):1047-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.