Mark George to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark George has written about Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Connection Strength
5.621
-
Optimized APPS-tDCS electrode position, size, and distance doubles the on-target stimulation magnitude in 3000 electric field models. Sci Rep. 2022 11 22; 12(1):20116.
Score: 0.722
-
Electric Field Strength From Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Determines Degree of Working Memory Response: A Potential Application of Reverse-Calculation Modeling? Neuromodulation. 2022 Jun; 25(4):578-587.
Score: 0.684
-
Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jul - Aug; 13(4):961-969.
Score: 0.603
-
Prefrontal versus motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on post-surgical opioid use. Brain Stimul. 2017 Nov - Dec; 10(6):1096-1101.
Score: 0.503
-
Long-lasting analgesic effect of transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment of chronic endometriosis pain. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Dec; 41(12):1998-2001.
Score: 0.440
-
Oscillating Square Wave Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Delivered During Slow Wave Sleep Does Not Improve Declarative Memory More Than Sham: A Randomized Sham Controlled Crossover Study. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun; 8(3):528-34.
Score: 0.421
-
Cathodal and anodal left prefrontal tDCS and the perception of control over pain. Clin J Pain. 2014 Aug; 30(8):693-700.
Score: 0.406
-
Digitalized transcranial electrical stimulation: A consensus statement. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 11; 143:154-165.
Score: 0.178
-
From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury. Prog Brain Res. 2021; 264:287-322.
Score: 0.160
-
Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 03; 132(3):819-837.
Score: 0.157
-
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation vs Sham Stimulation to Treat Aphasia After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 12 01; 75(12):1470-1476.
Score: 0.137
-
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Poststroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Opportunities. PM R. 2018 Sep; 10(9 Suppl 2):S157-S164.
Score: 0.135
-
BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov - Dec; 11(6):1276-1281.
Score: 0.134
-
Evidence of transcranial direct current stimulation-generated electric fields at subthalamic level in human brain in?vivo. Brain Stimul. 2018 Jul - Aug; 11(4):727-733.
Score: 0.130
-
Charge density, not current density, is a more comprehensive safety measure of transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Behav Immun. 2017 11; 66:414-415.
Score: 0.125
-
Quantitative reassessment of safety limits of tDCS for two animal studies. Brain Stimul. 2017 Sep - Oct; 10(5):1011-1012.
Score: 0.125
-
Safety and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation to stroke patients - A phase I current escalation study. Brain Stimul. 2017 May - Jun; 10(3):553-559.
Score: 0.121
-
Motor/Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Following Lumbar Surgery Reduces Postoperative Analgesia Use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May; 41(10):835-9.
Score: 0.115
-
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Motor Recovery Studies Exhibit a Dose-Response Relationship. Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb; 9(1):16-26.
Score: 0.109
-
Consensus Paper: Probing Homeostatic Plasticity of Human Cortex With Non-invasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015 Sep-Oct; 8(5):993-1006.
Score: 0.109
-
Consensus Paper: Probing Homeostatic Plasticity of Human Cortex With Non-invasive Transcranial Brain Stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun; 8(3):442-54.
Score: 0.106