Nichole Tanner to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nichole Tanner has written about United States.
Connection Strength
0.830
-
Guideline-Recommended Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Is Superior With a?Centralized Approach. Chest. 2022 03; 161(3):818-825.
Score: 0.079
-
Improving Inequities in Lung Cancer Screening: Risk Prediction Models and the Potential to Achieve a Great Equalizer Effect. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 11; 15(11):1711-1713.
Score: 0.074
-
Association of Cigarette Type and Nicotine Dependence in Patients Presenting for Lung Cancer Screening. Chest. 2020 11; 158(5):2184-2191.
Score: 0.073
-
Screening Adherence in the Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project. Chest. 2020 10; 158(4):1742-1752.
Score: 0.072
-
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a Lung Cancer Risk: Worth Its Weight in "GOLD". Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 03; 14(3):309-310.
Score: 0.058
-
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 11; 13(11):1977-1982.
Score: 0.057
-
Management of Pulmonary Nodules by Community Pulmonologists: A Multicenter Observational Study. Chest. 2015 Dec; 148(6):1405-1414.
Score: 0.053
-
Racial Differences in Outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial. Implications for Widespread Implementation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15; 192(2):200-8.
Score: 0.052
-
Attitudes and beliefs toward lung cancer screening among US Veterans. Chest. 2013 Dec; 144(6):1783-1787.
Score: 0.046
-
Training for linear endobronchial ultrasound among US pulmonary/critical care fellowships: a survey of fellowship directors. Chest. 2013 Feb 01; 143(2):423-428.
Score: 0.044
-
Research Priorities for Interventions to Address Health Disparities in Lung Nodule Management: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 03 15; 207(6):e31-e46.
Score: 0.022
-
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov; 175(11):1501-1505.
Score: 0.021
-
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 10 01; 202(7):e95-e112.
Score: 0.019
-
Occurrence of Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in the USA, 2017. J Cancer Educ. 2020 08; 35(4):678-681.
Score: 0.018
-
Comparison of Observed Harms and Expected Mortality Benefit for Persons in the Veterans Health Affairs Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 03 01; 178(3):426-428.
Score: 0.015
-
Underuse of Chest Radiography Versus Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening. Am J Public Health. 2017 08; 107(8):1248-1250.
Score: 0.015
-
ATS Core Curriculum 2017: Part IV. Adult Pulmonary Medicine. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 08; 14(Suppl_2):S196-S208.
Score: 0.015
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Survival. Chest. 2017 09; 152(3):587-597.
Score: 0.015
-
Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 03 01; 177(3):399-406.
Score: 0.014
-
Viewing All the Trees in the Forest: The Importance of Reporting Abnormal Findings on CT Scan When Screening for Lung Cancer. Chest. 2017 03; 151(3):525-526.
Score: 0.014
-
Evaluations of Implementation at Early-Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: Lessons Learned. Chest. 2017 07; 152(1):70-80.
Score: 0.014
-
Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 09; 13(9):1568-74.
Score: 0.014
-
An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 01; 192(7):881-91.
Score: 0.013
-
Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan 01; 191(1):19-33.
Score: 0.012