Nichole Tanner to Early Detection of Cancer
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nichole Tanner has written about Early Detection of Cancer.
Connection Strength
7.907
-
An Evaluation of Annual Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening in a Large National Cohort. Am J Prev Med. 2022 08; 63(2):e59-e64.
Score: 0.545
-
Guideline-Recommended Lung Cancer Screening Adherence Is Superior With a?Centralized Approach. Chest. 2022 03; 161(3):818-825.
Score: 0.525
-
Improving Inequities in Lung Cancer Screening: Risk Prediction Models and the Potential to Achieve a Great Equalizer Effect. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 11; 15(11):1711-1713.
Score: 0.494
-
Association of Cigarette Type and Nicotine Dependence in Patients Presenting for Lung Cancer Screening. Chest. 2020 11; 158(5):2184-2191.
Score: 0.483
-
Screening Adherence in the Veterans Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project. Chest. 2020 10; 158(4):1742-1752.
Score: 0.479
-
Lung Cancer Screening: Patient Selection and Implementation. Clin Chest Med. 2020 03; 41(1):87-97.
Score: 0.472
-
In-person and Telephonic Shared Decision-making Visits for People Considering Lung Cancer Screening: An Assessment of Decision Quality. Chest. 2019 01; 155(1):236-238.
Score: 0.435
-
Shared Decision-making and Lung Cancer Screening: Let's Get the Conversation Started. Chest. 2019 01; 155(1):21-24.
Score: 0.430
-
Reviewing Lung Cancer Screening: The Who, Where, When, Why, and How. Clin Chest Med. 2018 03; 39(1):31-43.
Score: 0.411
-
Assessing the Generalizability of the National Lung Screening Trial: Comparison of Patients with Stage 1 Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 09 01; 196(5):602-608.
Score: 0.397
-
The Association between Smoking Abstinence and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar 01; 193(5):534-41.
Score: 0.358
-
Screening for Lung Cancer Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Are We Headed for DANTE's Paradise or Inferno? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15; 191(10):1100-1.
Score: 0.338
-
Attitudes and beliefs toward lung cancer screening among US Veterans. Chest. 2013 Dec; 144(6):1783-1787.
Score: 0.306
-
New testing for lung cancer screening. Oncology (Williston Park). 2012 Feb; 26(2):176-82.
Score: 0.270
-
An up to date look at lung cancer screening. Cell Adh Migr. 2010 Jan-Mar; 4(1):96-9.
Score: 0.234
-
Addressing Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility and Healthcare Access. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 10 01; 202(7):e95-e112.
Score: 0.123
-
Occurrence of Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in the USA, 2017. J Cancer Educ. 2020 08; 35(4):678-681.
Score: 0.121
-
Association of Cigarette Type With Lung Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Secondary Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 12 01; 179(12):1710-1712.
Score: 0.116
-
Incorporating Coexisting Chronic Illness into Decisions about Patient Selection for Lung Cancer Screening. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 07 15; 198(2):e3-e13.
Score: 0.105
-
Tobacco Dependence Predicts Higher Lung Cancer and Mortality Rates and Lower Rates of Smoking Cessation in the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest. 2018 07; 154(1):110-118.
Score: 0.104
-
Comparison of Observed Harms and Expected Mortality Benefit for Persons in the Veterans Health Affairs Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 03 01; 178(3):426-428.
Score: 0.103
-
Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 03 01; 177(3):399-406.
Score: 0.096
-
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease as a Lung Cancer Risk: Worth Its Weight in "GOLD". Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 03; 14(3):309-310.
Score: 0.096
-
Evaluations of Implementation at Early-Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: Lessons Learned. Chest. 2017 07; 152(1):70-80.
Score: 0.096
-
Physician Assessment of Pretest Probability of Malignancy and Adherence With Guidelines for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation. Chest. 2017 08; 152(2):263-270.
Score: 0.095
-
Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 11; 13(11):1977-1982.
Score: 0.094
-
Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 09; 13(9):1568-74.
Score: 0.093
-
Reply: Lung Cancer Screening: The Balance between Harm and Benefit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 May 15; 191(10):1209-10.
Score: 0.085
-
Screening and early detection efforts in lung cancer. Cancer. 2015 May 01; 121(9):1347-56.
Score: 0.083
-
Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan 01; 191(1):19-33.
Score: 0.082
-
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov; 175(11):1501-1505.
Score: 0.035
-
Factors Associated With Smoking Cessation Attempts in Lung Cancer Screening: A Secondary Analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest. 2023 02; 163(2):433-443.
Score: 0.035
-
Tobacco Treatment Specialist Training for Lung Cancer Screening Providers. Am J Prev Med. 2021 11; 61(5):765-768.
Score: 0.032
-
Management of Lung Nodules and Lung Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: CHEST Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2020 07; 158(1):406-415.
Score: 0.030
-
Management of Lung Nodules and Lung Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic: CHEST Expert Panel Report. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Jul; 17(7):845-854.
Score: 0.030
-
Safely and Effectively Evaluating Computed Tomography-detected Lung Lesions. Much Work to Be Done. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 11; 16(11):1360-1362.
Score: 0.029
-
Underuse of Chest Radiography Versus Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening. Am J Public Health. 2017 08; 107(8):1248-1250.
Score: 0.025
-
Viewing All the Trees in the Forest: The Importance of Reporting Abnormal Findings on CT Scan When Screening for Lung Cancer. Chest. 2017 03; 151(3):525-526.
Score: 0.024