Connection

Nir Menachemi to Cross-Sectional Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Nir Menachemi has written about Cross-Sectional Studies.
Connection Strength

2.638
  1. State-level regulations and opioid-related health outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 03 01; 232:109294.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  2. Institutional factors associated with hospital partnerships for population health: A pooled cross-sectional analysis. Health Care Manage Rev. 2022 Jul-Sep 01; 47(3):254-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  3. Contemporary Trends in Hospitalizations for Comorbid Chronic Liver Disease and Substance Use Disorders. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 06 18; 12(6):e00372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  4. Symptoms and symptom clusters associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in community-based populations: Results from a statewide epidemiological study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0241875.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  5. Trends in governance structure and activities among not-for-profit U.S. hospitals: 2009-2015. Health Care Manage Rev. 2019 Jul/Sep; 44(3):263-273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  6. Graduation and Academic Placement of Underrepresented Racial/Ethnic Minority Doctoral Recipients in Public Health Disciplines, United States, 2003-2015. Public Health Rep. 2019 Jan/Feb; 134(1):63-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  7. Environmental market factors associated with electronic health record adoption among cancer hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Oct/Dec; 43(4):303-314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  8. Employment Trends Among Public Health Doctoral Recipients, 2003-2015. Am J Public Health. 2018 09; 108(9):1171-1177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  9. Market characteristics associated with community health assessments by local health departments. Public Health. 2018 Sep; 162:118-125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  10. Determinants of turnover among low wage earners in long term care: the role of manager-employee relationships. Geriatr Nurs. 2018 Jul - Aug; 39(4):407-413.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  11. Interdisciplinary Dissertation Research Among Public Health Doctoral Trainees, 2003-2015. Public Health Rep. 2018 Mar/Apr; 133(2):182-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  12. Using structured and unstructured data to identify patients' need for services that address the social determinants of health. Int J Med Inform. 2017 11; 107:101-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  13. The relationship between the external environment and physician e-mail communication: The mediating role of health information technology availability. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Apr/Jun; 42(2):122-131.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  14. Use of foreign-educated nurses and patient satisfaction in U.S. hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Oct-Dec; 41(4):306-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  15. Are there differences in health information exchange by health system type? Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Oct-Dec; 41(4):325-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  16. Obesity, Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors in Children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Matern Child Health J. 2016 Feb; 20(2):466-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  17. Measuring Patient Satisfaction's Relationship to Hospital Cost Efficiency: Can Administrators Make a Difference? Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jan-Mar; 41(1):56-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  18. Do hospitals that do the right thing have more satisfied patients? Health Care Manage Rev. 2015 Oct-Dec; 40(4):348-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  19. Local Public Health Department Characteristics Associated With Likelihood to Participate in National Accreditation. Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug; 105(8):1653-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  20. LOWER SATISFACTION AMONG HOSPITALS THAT DISPROPORTIONATELY TREAT BLACK PATIENTS. J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2015; 38(3):290-316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  21. Community benefits provided by religious, other nonprofit, and for-profit hospitals: a longitudinal analysis 2000-2009. Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Apr-Jun; 39(2):145-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  22. Characteristics of low-severity emergency department use among CHIP enrollees. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Dec 01; 19(12):e391-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  23. Overcoming challenges to achieving meaningful use: insights from hospitals that successfully received Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services payments in 2011. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Mar-Apr; 20(2):233-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  24. Environmental market factors associated with physician career satisfaction. J Healthc Manag. 2012 Sep-Oct; 57(5):307-22; discussion 323-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  25. Hospital characteristics related to the intention to apply for meaningful use incentive payments. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2012; 9:1h.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  26. Is electronic health record use associated with patient satisfaction in hospitals? Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Jan-Mar; 37(1):23-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  27. Environmental factors and health information technology management strategy. Health Care Manage Rev. 2011 Jul-Sep; 36(3):275-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  28. Best of breed strategies--hospital characteristics associated with organizational HIT strategy. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009; 23(2):46-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  29. Physicians' use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. J Med Internet Res. 2006 Mar 24; 8(1):e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  30. Social determinants of health and emergency department utilization in Alabama Children's Health Insurance Program. Am J Manag Care. 2023 Mar; 29(3):159-164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  31. Community Coronavirus Disease 2019 Activity Level and Nursing Home Staff Testing for Active Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Indiana. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 01; 22(1):204-208.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  32. Meaningful Use Of EHRs Among Hospitals Ineligible For Incentives Lags Behind That Of Other Hospitals, 2009-13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Mar; 35(3):495-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  33. The impact of texting bans on motor vehicle crash-related hospitalizations. Am J Public Health. 2015 May; 105(5):859-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  34. Management involvement on the board of directors and hospital financial performance. J Healthc Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec; 59(6):429-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  35. Environmental factors and quality improvement in county and local health departments. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun; 19(3):240-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  36. Payer mix and EHR adoption in hospitals. J Healthc Manag. 2012 Nov-Dec; 57(6):435-48; discussion 449-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  37. Characteristics of all, occasional, and frequent emergency department visits due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Florida. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Apr-Jun; 35(2):149-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  38. Hospital patient safety levels among healthcare's "most wired" institutions. J Healthc Qual. 2010 Mar-Apr; 32(2):16-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  39. Full implementation of computerized physician order entry and medication-related quality outcomes: a study of 3364 hospitals. Am J Med Qual. 2009 Jul-Aug; 24(4):278-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. Breast cancer knowledge and attitudes toward mammography as predictors of breast cancer preventive behavior in Kazakh, Korean, and Russian women in Kazakhstan. Int J Public Health. 2008; 53(3):123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  41. A comparative study of quality outcomes in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers and hospital-based outpatient departments: 1997-2004. Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct; 43(5 Pt 1):1485-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.