Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Peter Cotton and Joseph Romagnuolo.
Connection Strength

3.547
  1. Recording ERCP fluoroscopy metrics using a multinational quality network: establishing benchmarks and examining time-related improvements. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug; 108(8):1224-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.476
  2. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul; 70(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  3. Designing clinical trials for NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008 Apr; 18(2):371-85; xi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.329
  4. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar; 67(3):471-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  5. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct; 47(10):884-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  6. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May; 311(20):2101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  7. Can patient and pain characteristics predict manometric sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in patients with clinically suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction? Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May; 79(5):765-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  8. Psychosocial characteristics and pain burden of patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in the EPISOD multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar; 109(3):436-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  9. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 10; 13:147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  10. The ERCP quality network: a pilot study of benchmarking practice and performance. Am J Med Qual. 2013 May-Jun; 28(3):256-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  11. The ERCP quality network benchmarking project: a preliminary comparison of practice in UK and USA. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul; 3(3):157-161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  12. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May; 73(5):868-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  13. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part I: cardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar; 73(3):579-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  14. Identifying and reporting risk factors for adverse events in endoscopy. Part II: noncardiopulmonary events. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar; 73(3):586-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  15. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov; 72(5):986-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  16. Measuring episodic abdominal pain and disability in suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 21; 16(35):4416-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  17. Low symptomatic premature stent occlusion of multiple plastic stents for benign biliary strictures: comparing standard and prolonged stent change intervals. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep; 72(3):558-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  18. Chronic calcific pancreatitis: combination ERCP and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones. South Med J. 2010 Jun; 103(6):505-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  19. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar; 71(3):446-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  20. Long-term clinical outcomes after endoscopic minor papilla therapy in symptomatic patients with pancreas divisum. Pancreas. 2009 Nov; 38(8):903-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  21. Miss rate of pancreas divisum by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in clinical practice. Pancreas. 2008 Aug; 37(2):151-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  22. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov; 64(5):705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  23. Evaluation of Pharmacologic Prevention of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jul; 13(7):1231-9; quiz e70-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  24. Standardized endoscopic reporting. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb; 29(2):234-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  25. Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis. Nat Genet. 2012 Dec; 44(12):1349-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  26. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes: 2011. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Jun; 32(6):527-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  27. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible gastrointestinal endoscopes: 2011. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jun; 73(6):1075-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  28. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun; 69(7):1271-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  29. Small prophylactic pancreatic duct stents: an assessment of spontaneous passage and stent-induced ductal abnormalities. Endoscopy. 2007 Dec; 39(12):1082-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.