Connection

Peter Cotton to Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Cotton has written about Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic.
Connection Strength

5.575
  1. Why did the sham-treated EPISOD study subjects do so well? Important lessons for research and practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 05; 89(5):1054-1055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.636
  2. The EPISOD study: long-term outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jan; 87(1):205-210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.571
  3. Reply to Thomson. Endoscopy. 2016 Mar; 48(3):298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.527
  4. Incidence and predictors of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction undergoing biliary or dual sphincterotomy: results from the EPISOD prospective multicenter randomized sham-controlled study. Endoscopy. 2015 Oct; 47(10):884-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  5. Effect of endoscopic sphincterotomy for suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction on pain-related disability following cholecystectomy: the EPISOD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 May; 311(20):2101-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.464
  6. Challenges in planning and initiating a randomized clinical study of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Nov; 72(5):986-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  7. Botulinum toxin injection after biliary sphincterotomy. Endoscopy. 2004 Aug; 36(8):744; author reply 745.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  8. Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Sphincter of Oddi Disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 03; 20(3):e627-e634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  9. Feasibility of stent placement above the sphincter of Oddi ("inside-stent") for patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1998 Oct; 30(8):687-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  10. Adverse Events and Reinterventions Following Pancreatic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy. Pancreas. 2018 08; 47(7):880-883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  11. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for stones by experts is safe, even in younger patients with normal ducts. Ann Surg. 1998 Feb; 227(2):201-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  12. Needleknife precut sphincterotomy: the devil is in the indications. Endoscopy. 1997 Nov; 29(9):888.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  13. Early ERCP and papillotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 19; 336(25):1835; author reply 1836.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  14. Transpapillary stenting of proximal biliary strictures: does biliary sphincterotomy reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jan; 45(1):46-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  15. Is your sphincterotomy really safe--and necessary? Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Dec; 44(6):752-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  16. A sphincterotome with variable-length wire. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 Nov; 42(5):494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  17. Cystic duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy despite preoperative sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 May; 41(5):511-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  18. Endoscopic treatment in pancreas divisum. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Aug; 89(8):1152-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  19. Psychosocial characteristics and pain burden of patients with suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction in the EPISOD multicenter trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar; 109(3):436-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  20. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun; 69(7):1271-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  21. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov; 64(5):705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  22. Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Mar; 63(3):378-82; quiz 464.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  23. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan; 61(1):53-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  24. Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep; 60(3):367-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  25. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1998 Dec; 115(6):1518-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  26. ERCP and sphincterotomy in the context of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: academic and community practice patterns and results. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Apr; 92(4):597-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  27. Pitfalls of bile duct stone removal after balloon sphincter dilation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr; 91(4):822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  28. Balloon dilatation of the sphincter of Oddi facilitates passage of glass beads from the canine biliary tract. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1994 Dec; 4(6):413-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  29. Predicting native papilla biliary cannulation success using a multinational Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Quality Network. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 10; 13:147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  30. Endoscopic sphincterotomy, nasobiliary drainage and biliary stent placement without image intensification. Br J Surg. 1993 Jun; 80(6):807.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  31. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr; 165(4):474-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  32. Removal of stones from the bile duct at ERCP without sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Nov-Dec; 39(6):749-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.