Connection

Peter Cotton to Retrospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Cotton has written about Retrospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.593
  1. Collecting delayed adverse events after ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 10; 94(4):877.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  2. Low symptomatic premature stent occlusion of multiple plastic stents for benign biliary strictures: comparing standard and prolonged stent change intervals. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep; 72(3):558-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  3. Chronic calcific pancreatitis: combination ERCP and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones. South Med J. 2010 Jun; 103(6):505-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  4. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul; 70(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  5. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar; 67(3):471-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  6. Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits; mainly about indications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Mar; 63(3):378-82; quiz 464.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  7. The yield and the predictors of esophageal pathology when upper endoscopy is used for the initial evaluation of dysphagia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jun; 61(7):804-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  8. Predictors of outcome in pancreatic duct disruption managed by endoscopic transpapillary stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Apr; 61(4):568-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Technical outcomes and complications of ERCP in children. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep; 60(3):367-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Pancreatic duct stent insertion for functional smoldering pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Sep; 58(3):438-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. Yield of colonoscopy in patients with nonacute rectal bleeding: a multicenter database study of 1766 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb; 97(2):328-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  12. Comparison of Urologist- vs Gastroenterologist-Directed Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Pancreaticolithiasis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 06; 19(6):1234-1239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  13. The revised Atlanta criteria more accurately reflect severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis compared to the consensus criteria. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 05; 7(4):557-564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  14. Feasibility of stent placement above the sphincter of Oddi ("inside-stent") for patients with malignant biliary obstruction. Endoscopy. 1998 Oct; 30(8):687-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  15. Adverse Events and Reinterventions Following Pancreatic Endoscopic Sphincterotomy. Pancreas. 2018 08; 47(7):880-883.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  16. Outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for chronic acalculous cholecystitis. Am Surg. 1998 Jan; 64(1):1-5; discussion 5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  17. Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr; 91(4):762-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  18. An assessment of existing risk stratification guidelines for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2016 10; 30(10):4613-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  19. ERCP following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and effective way to manage CBD stones and complications. HPB Surg. 1995 Jun; 8(3):187-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  20. Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 1995 Mar; 21(3):661-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  21. Alcohol's threat to liver transplant recipients may be overstated, suggests retrospective study. JAMA. 1994 Jun 15; 271(23):1815.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  22. Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia in a region of Canada. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Feb; 16(2):141-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. Post-ERCP pancreatitis rates do not differ between needle-knife and pull-type pancreatic sphincterotomy techniques: a multiendoscopist 13-year experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jun; 69(7):1271-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Small prophylactic pancreatic duct stents: an assessment of spontaneous passage and stent-induced ductal abnormalities. Endoscopy. 2007 Dec; 39(12):1082-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for pancreas divisum by using a needle-knife or standard pull-type technique: safety and reintervention rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Nov; 64(5):705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding after the introduction of microprocessor-controlled electrosurgery: does the new technology make the difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan; 61(1):53-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of pediatric pancreaticobiliary disorders. J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Feb; 32(2):158-64; discussion 164-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  28. Removal of stones from the bile duct at ERCP without sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Nov-Dec; 39(6):749-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  29. Stent placement for benign pancreatic diseases: correlation between ERCP findings and clinical response. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Oct; 159(4):751-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg. 1992 Jan; 163(1):111-5; discussion 115-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. Anatomic variants and artifacts in ERCP interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 May; 156(5):975-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  32. Endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction: stents of 10 French gauge are preferable to stents of 8 French gauge. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988 Sep-Oct; 34(5):412-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.