Sheldon Litwin to Computed Tomography Angiography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sheldon Litwin has written about Computed Tomography Angiography.
Connection Strength
2.041
-
Effects of obesity on noninvasive test results in patients with suspected cardiac ischemia: Insights from the PROMISE trial. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Jul - Aug; 13(4):211-218.
Score: 0.487
-
In-Hospital Cost Comparison of Triple-Rule-Out Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Acute Chest Pain. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35(3):198-203.
Score: 0.131
-
Discordances between predicted and actual risk in obese patients with suspected cardiac ischaemia. Heart. 2020 02; 106(4):273-279.
Score: 0.126
-
Gender differences in the diagnostic performance of machine learning coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve -results from the MACHINE registry. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Oct; 119:108657.
Score: 0.125
-
Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
Score: 0.125
-
Relationship Between Pregnancy Complications and Subsequent Coronary Artery Disease Assessed by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Black Women. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 07; 12(7):e008754.
Score: 0.124
-
Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol. Eur Radiol. 2018 May; 28(5):2134-2142.
Score: 0.111
-
Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):17-33.
Score: 0.110
-
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
Score: 0.110
-
Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Machine Learning for Risk Stratification of Non-Culprit Coronary Narrowings in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 15; 120(8):1260-1266.
Score: 0.108
-
Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT?Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 10; 10(10 Pt A):1116-1124.
Score: 0.105
-
Low contrast medium-volume third-generation dual-source computed tomography angiography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning. Eur Radiol. 2017 May; 27(5):1944-1953.
Score: 0.102
-
Sex Differences in Functional and CT?Angiography Testing in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 07; 67(22):2607-16.
Score: 0.099
-
Coronary CT angiography in obese patients using 3(rd) generation dual-source CT: effect of body mass index on image quality. Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep; 26(9):2937-46.
Score: 0.097
-
Sex differences in management and outcomes of patients with stable symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease: Insights from the PROMISE trial. Am Heart J. 2019 02; 208:28-36.
Score: 0.030
-
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification in Patients With Acute Coronary?Syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2017 03 01; 119(5):712-718.
Score: 0.026
-
Prognostic value of CT-derived left atrial and left ventricular measures in patients with acute chest pain. Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan; 86:163-168.
Score: 0.026