Connection

Steven Swift to Pelvic Organ Prolapse

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Steven Swift has written about Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Connection Strength

7.850
  1. Update in Transvaginal Grafts: The Role of Lightweight Meshes, Biologics, and Hybrid Grafts in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep; 48(3):515-533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.743
  2. The International Urogynaecology Consultation: the new IUGA educational project. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 09; 32(9):2309-2310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.740
  3. Genital Hiatus Size as a Predictor of Progression of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):e555-e558.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.731
  4. Factors affecting patient choice for continued observation versus intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 02; 32(2):273-278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.689
  5. Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan; 30(1):47-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.595
  6. POP-Q stage I prolapse: is it time to alter our terminology? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr; 25(4):445-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  7. Outcomes of observation as therapy for pelvic organ prolapse: a study in the natural history of pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Apr; 32(4):383-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  8. Does neuromuscular blockade affect the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov; 23(11):1599-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.389
  9. Validation of Persian version of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life questionnaire (P-QOL). Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb; 23(2):229-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.371
  10. To mesh or not to mesh? That is the question. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 May; 22(5):505-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.361
  11. The inter-system association between the simplified pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (S-POP) and the standard pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) in describing pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Mar; 22(3):347-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  12. Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QOL questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan; 21(1):53-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  13. A narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of latent stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 08; 38 Suppl 4:S7-S11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  14. Transcultural translation and validation of the FIGO Assessment Scoring System (FASS) to Portuguese language. Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jan; 30(1):131-137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  15. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 08; 37(S6):S39-S43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  16. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: where are we now? Int Urogynecol J. 2018 01; 29(1):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  17. Validation of the Polish version of P-QoL questionnaire. Ginekol Pol. 2016; 87(7):477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  18. Validation of the French version of the P-QoL questionnaire. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Sep; 192:10-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  19. Validation of the Spanish-language version of the Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire in Chilean women. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan; 26(1):123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  20. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in general population with pelvic organ prolapse: a study based on the prolapse quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QOL). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov; 182:22-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  21. Body image in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire: development and validation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug; 211(2):174.e1-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  22. To pull or not to pull, that is the question?how should we define prolapse? Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Dec; 24(12):1995-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  23. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 May; 23(5):527-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  24. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr; 31(4):415-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  25. Transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: more FDA concerns--positive reactions are possible. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jan; 23(1):11-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  26. Multicenter inter-examiner agreement trial for the validation of simplified POPQ system. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jun; 22(6):645-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  27. The FIGO assessment scoring system (FASS): a new holistic classification tool to assess women with pelvic floor dysfunction: validity and reliability. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun; 26(6):859-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  28. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010; 29(1):4-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.