Connection

U. Schoepf to Coronary Vessels

This is a "connection" page, showing publications U. Schoepf has written about Coronary Vessels.
Connection Strength

10.048
  1. Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 02; 13(2 Pt 1):524-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.544
  2. Prognostic value of CT myocardial perfusion imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve for major adverse cardiac events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 May - Jun; 13(3):26-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.517
  3. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Dec 15; 120(12):2121-2127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.469
  4. Prognostic implications of coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec; 10(6):458-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  5. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  6. Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging identifies early perfusion abnormalities in diabetes and hypertension: Insights from a multicenter registry. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):301-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.428
  7. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.422
  8. CT Evaluation of Small-Diameter Coronary Artery Stents: Effect of an Integrated Circuit Detector with Iterative Reconstruction. Radiology. 2015 Sep; 276(3):706-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.394
  9. Reply: the ethics of publishing dual exposure scans involving ionizing radiation when validated alternatives exist. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Sep; 7(9):964-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.380
  10. Coronary artery computed tomography scanning. Circulation. 2014 Mar 25; 129(12):1341-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  11. Iterative reconstruction to preserve image quality and diagnostic accuracy at reduced radiation dose in coronary CT angiography: an intraindividual comparison. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Dec; 6(12):1239-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.358
  12. Iterative image reconstruction: a realistic dose-saving method in cardiac CT imaging? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Apr; 11(4):403-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  13. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the pulmonary artery with reversal of flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 23; 60(17):e31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  14. Coronary artery plaque formation at coronary CT angiography: morphological analysis and relationship to hemodynamics. Eur Radiol. 2009 Apr; 19(4):837-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  15. Stable patients with suspected myocardial ischemia: comparison of machine-learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve and stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to detect myocardial ischemia. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 02 05; 22(1):34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  16. Relationship of age, atherosclerosis and angiographic stenosis using artificial intelligence. Open Heart. 2021 11; 8(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  17. Automated detection of lung nodules and coronary artery calcium using artificial intelligence on low-dose CT scans for lung cancer screening: accuracy and prognostic value. BMC Med. 2021 03 04; 19(1):55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  18. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features prognostic information in patients with suspected myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries. Int J Cardiol. 2021 03 15; 327:223-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  19. Machine Learning and Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020 07 09; 22(9):90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  20. Ischemia and outcome prediction by cardiac CT based machine learning. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Dec; 36(12):2429-2439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  21. Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov; 30(11):5834-5840.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  22. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Algorithm Implementing a Recurrent Neural Network With Long Short-term Memory for the Automated Detection of Calcified Plaques From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. J Thorac Imaging. 2020 May; 35 Suppl 1:S49-S57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  23. Correlation of machine learning computed tomography-based fractional flow reserve with instantaneous wave free ratio to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Jun; 109(6):735-745.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  24. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. Am J Cardiol. 2019 11 01; 124(9):1340-1348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  25. Diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease using computed tomography angiography in patients with stable chest pain depending on clinical probability and in clinically important subgroups: meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. 2019 06 12; 365:l1945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  26. Machine Learning Using CT-FFR Predicts Proximal Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation Associated With LAD Myocardial Bridging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 08; 12(8 Pt 1):1591-1593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  27. Intermodel disagreement of myocardial blood flow estimation from dynamic CT perfusion imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jan; 110:175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  28. Fractional flow reserve derived from CCTA may have a prognostic role in myocardial bridging. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jun; 29(6):3017-3026.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  29. Artificial intelligence machine learning-based coronary CT fractional flow reserve (CT-FFRML): Impact of iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019 Nov - Dec; 13(6):331-335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  30. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Cardiothoracic Vascular Imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018 Jul; 56(4):521-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  31. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine-Learning Approach to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve: Result From the MACHINE Consortium. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 06; 11(6):e007217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  32. Predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography in asymptomatic individuals with diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jul - Aug; 12(4):320-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  33. Heavily Calcified Coronary Arteries: Advanced Calcium Subtraction Improves Luminal Visualization and Diagnostic Confidence in Dual-Energy Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2018 02; 53(2):103-109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  34. Coronary artery assessment using self-navigated free-breathing radial whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography in patients with congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar; 28(3):1267-1275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  35. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):397-403.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  36. Iterative beam-hardening correction with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction in low voltage CT coronary calcium scoring with tin filtration: Impact on coronary artery calcium quantification and image quality. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Sep - Oct; 11(5):354-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  37. Coronary artery calcium in breast cancer survivors after radiation therapy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Sep; 33(9):1425-1431.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  38. Combined diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography and computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve for the evaluation of myocardial ischemia: A meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 01; 236:100-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  39. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017 Mar - Apr; 11(2):141-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  40. Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and?Data?System (CAD-RADS): An Expert Consensus Document of SCCT, ACR and NASCI: Endorsed by the ACC. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 09; 9(9):1099-1113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  41. CAD-RADS(TM) Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug; 10(4):269-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  42. Approaches to ultra-low radiation dose coronary artery calcium scoring based on 3rd generation dual-source CT: A phantom study. Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  43. Impact of an advanced image-based monoenergetic reconstruction algorithm on coronary stent visualization using third generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jun; 26(6):1871-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  44. Comparison of quantitative stenosis characteristics at routine coronary computed tomography angiography with invasive fractional flow reserve for assessing lesion-specific ischemia. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec; 9(6):546-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  45. A novel approach for fractional flow reserve derivation from coronary computed tomographic angiography. Coron Artery Dis. 2015 May; 26(3):279-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  46. Prevalence and types of coronary to pulmonary artery fistula in a Chinese population at dual-source CT coronary angiography. Acta Radiol. 2014 Nov; 55(9):1031-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  47. Spontaneous multivessel coronary artery dissection causing massive myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Feb 05; 61(5):589.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  48. Serial Changes in Coronary Plaque Formation Using CT Angiography in Patients Undergoing PCSK9-Inhibitor Therapy With 1-year Follow-up. J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Sep 01; 37(5):285-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  49. Deep learning for vessel-specific coronary artery calcium scoring: validation on a multi-centre dataset. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 06 01; 23(6):846-854.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  50. Machine Learning for the Prevalence and Severity of Coronary Artery Calcification in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Chinese Large Cohort Study. J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Nov 01; 37(6):401-408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  51. Serial coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and plaque progression can predict long-term outcomes of coronary artery disease. Eur Radiol. 2021 Sep; 31(9):7110-7120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  52. Clinical applications of machine learning in cardiovascular disease and its relevance to cardiac imaging. Eur Heart J. 2019 06 21; 40(24):1975-1986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  53. Current and future applications of CT coronary calcium assessment. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018 Jun; 16(6):441-453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  54. Correction Factors for CT Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Advanced Modeled Iterative Reconstruction Instead of Filtered Back Projection. Acad Radiol. 2016 12; 23(12):1480-1489.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  55. Iterative image reconstruction techniques: cardiothoracic computed tomography applications. J Thorac Imaging. 2014 Jul; 29(4):198-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  56. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial volume perfusion imaging with second generation dual-source computed tomography: Concepts and first experiences. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Mar-Apr; 4(2):127-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  57. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 01; 104(3):318-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.