Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Walter Renne and Anthony Mennito.
Connection Strength

4.454
  1. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of complete arch digital impressions on a human maxilla using seven different intraoral digital impression systems and a laboratory scanner. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 07; 31(4):369-377.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.716
  2. Evaluation of the effect scan pattern has on the trueness and precision of six intraoral digital impression systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 03; 30(2):113-118.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.659
  3. Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Using Two Different Chairside CAD/CAM Systems on Preparations of Varying Quality. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug; 27(4):194-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.550
  4. Predicting marginal fit of CAD/CAM crowns based on the presence or absence of common preparation errors. J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Nov; 108(5):310-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.456
  5. A simplified technique for restoring interproximal root surface lesions. Oper Dent. 2012 Mar-Apr; 37(2):211-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.433
  6. Assessing the Antimicrobial Properties of Copper-Iodide Doped Adhesives in an In vitro Caries Model: A Pilot Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Apr-Jun; 13(2):118-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  7. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Mar; 32(2):204-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  8. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  9. A novel method for complex three-dimensional evaluation of intraoral scanner accuracy. Int J Comput Dent. 2019; 22(3):239-249.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  10. A novel technique for reference point generation to aid in intraoral scan alignment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 11 12; 29(6):391-395.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  11. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in?vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  12. Utilizing self-assessment software to evaluate student wax-ups in dental morphology. J Dent Educ. 2015 Jun; 79(6):697-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  13. E4D compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education. J Dent Educ. 2013 Feb; 77(2):168-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  14. The effect of software updates on the trueness and precision of intraoral scanners. Quintessence Int. 2021 Jun 09; 52(7):636-644.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiple digital impression systems on a fully edentulous maxilla. Quintessence Int. 2021 May 07; 52(6):488-495.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. Evaluation of complete-arch implant scanning with 5 different intraoral scanners in terms of trueness and operator experience. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Oct; 128(4):632-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  17. Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method. BMC Oral Health. 2020 04 07; 20(1):97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  18. Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 May; 22 Suppl 1:168-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  19. Anatomic Customization of Root-Analog Dental Implants With Cone-Beam CT and CAD/CAM Fabrication: A Cadaver-Based Pilot Evaluation. J Oral Implantol. 2018 Feb; 44(1):15-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Dental students' opinions of preparation assessment with E4D compare software versus traditional methods. J Dent Educ. 2014 Oct; 78(10):1424-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.