Connection

Donald Castell to Deglutition

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Donald Castell has written about Deglutition.
Donald Castell
Connection Strength
6.367
Deglutition
  1. Impact of Peppermint Therapy on Dysphagia and Non-cardiac Chest Pain: A Pilot Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2019 08; 64(8):2214-2218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.537
  2. Characteristics of Consecutive Esophageal Motility Diagnoses After a Decade of Change. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr; 50(4):301-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  3. Interobserver variability in esophageal body measurements with high-resolution manometry among new physician users. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Feb; 47(2):e12-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  4. Swallowing activity assessed by ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring predicts awake and asleep periods at night. Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Apr; 58(4):1049-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  5. Functional aspects of distal oesophageal spasm: the role of onset velocity and contraction amplitude on bolus transit. Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Jul; 44(7):569-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  6. Swallow evaluation during multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH: an alternate method to assess esophageal transit. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov-Dec; 45(10):862-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  7. Manometry and impedance characteristics of achalasia. Facts and myths. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar; 42(3):266-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  8. Revised criterion for diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility is associated with more frequent dysphagia and greater bolus transit abnormalities. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar; 103(3):699-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  9. Multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry data for unrestricted swallowing: establishing normal values. Dis Esophagus. 2008; 21(1):51-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  10. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008; 43(2):155-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  11. Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug; 42(8):917-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  12. Physiologic model of oropharyngeal swallowing revisited. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Aug; 133(2):234-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.210
  13. Effect of interval between swallows on oesophageal pressures and bolus movement in normal subjects - Studies with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004 Feb; 16(1):23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  14. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 May; 1(3):174-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  15. Effect of different swallow time intervals on the nutcracker esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Jan; 98(1):40-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  16. Are manometric parameters of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx affected by age and gender? Dysphagia. 2003; 18(3):211-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  17. Esophageal function testing using multichannel intraluminal impedance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Mar; 280(3):G457-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  18. Videomanometry of the pharynx in dysphagic patients with laryngeal barium penetration during swallowing. Acta Radiol. 1998 Jul; 39(4):405-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  19. Swallowing and esophageal function in Parkinson's disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct; 90(10):1741-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  20. Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment. Dysphagia. 1993; 8(3):270-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  21. Radial and longitudinal asymmetry of human pharyngeal pressures during swallowing. Gastroenterology. 1991 Dec; 101(6):1559-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  22. Aging-related alterations in human upper esophageal sphincter function. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Dec; 85(12):1569-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  23. High resolution esophageal manometry: devils and dinosaurs. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Jun; 22(6):600-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  24. Effects of body position and bolus consistency on the manometric parameters and coordination of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx. Dysphagia. 1990; 5(4):179-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  25. The effect of oral buspirone, pyridostigmine, and bethanechol on esophageal function evaluated with combined multichannel esophageal impedance-manometry in healthy volunteers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar; 43(3):253-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  26. Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009 Feb; 52(1):240-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  27. On-line computer analysis of human lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. Am J Physiol. 1988 Dec; 255(6 Pt 1):G794-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  28. MBS measurement tool for swallow impairment--MBSImp: establishing a standard. Dysphagia. 2008 Dec; 23(4):392-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  29. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  30. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2008 May; 53(5):1198-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  31. How many swallows are required to establish reliable esophageal peristaltic parameters in normal subjects? An on-line computer analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987 Aug; 82(8):754-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  32. Bethanechol improves smooth muscle function in patients with severe ineffective esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2007 Apr; 41(4):366-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  33. Clinical relevance of the nutcracker esophagus: suggested revision of criteria for diagnosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul; 40(6):504-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  34. Disposable balloon-based oesophageal motility catheters: comparison with solid-state transducers. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2005 Jun; 17(3):453-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  35. Clarification of the esophageal function defect in patients with manometric ineffective esophageal motility: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Mar; 2(3):230-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  36. Human esophageal response during chest pain induced by swallowing cold liquids. JAMA. 1981 Nov 06; 246(18):2057-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  37. Human esophageal response to rapid swallowing: muscle refractory period or neural inhibition? Am J Physiol. 1981 Aug; 241(2):G129-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  38. Current concepts of esophageal function. Am J Otolaryngol. 1980 Nov; 1(5):440-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  39. Dilatation therapy for dysphagia in patients with upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction--manometric and symptomatic response. Dis Esophagus. 1998 Oct; 11(4):254-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  40. Effect of dry swallows and wet swallows of different volumes on esophageal peristalsis. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jun; 38(6):1161-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  41. Manometric evaluation of the pharynx. Dysphagia. 1993; 8(4):337-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  42. Effect of head position on the dynamics of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharynx. Dysphagia. 1993; 8(1):1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  43. Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter function in achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Dec; 87(12):1712-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  44. Comparison of effects of upright versus supine body position and liquid versus solid bolus on esophageal pressures in normal humans. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jul; 35(7):857-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  45. Esophageal disorders in the elderly. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990 Jun; 19(2):235-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  46. Pharyngeal/upper esophageal sphincter pressure dynamics in humans. Effects of pharmacologic agents and thermal stimulation. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Jun; 35(6):774-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  47. Pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter manometry in humans. Am J Physiol. 1990 Feb; 258(2 Pt 1):G173-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  48. Esophageal motility disorders. Dis Mon. 1988 Jun; 34(6):297-389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  49. Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers. Variability of pressures with age and frequency of "abnormal" contractions. Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Jun; 32(6):583-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  50. Are esophageal motility abnormalities produced during the intraesophageal acid perfusion test? JAMA. 1985 Apr 05; 253(13):1914-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  51. Effects of position on oesophageal function: studies using combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003 Feb; 15(1):63-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  52. Physiology of the oesophagus. Clin Gastroenterol. 1982 Sep; 11(3):439-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  53. Pharyngoesophageal (Zenker's) diverticulum: a reappraisal. Gastroenterology. 1982 Apr; 82(4):734-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  54. The spectrum of esophageal motility disorders. Gastroenterology. 1979 Mar; 76(3):639-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  55. Esophageal function in elderly man. A new look at "presbyesophagus". Ann Intern Med. 1974 Mar; 80(3):371-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  56. On the genesis of heartburn. The effects of specific foods on the lower esophageal sphincter. Am J Dig Dis. 1973 May; 18(5):391-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  57. Differential sensitivity of the human esophagus to pentagastrin. Am J Physiol. 1972 Apr; 222(4):870-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.