Connection

Julio Chalela to Retrospective Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Julio Chalela has written about Retrospective Studies.
Julio Chalela
Connection Strength
0.386
Retrospective Studies
  1. Use of Helicopter Medical Transportation to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. Neurocrit Care. 2022 06; 36(3):797-801.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  2. New Onset Migraine Associated With a Civilian Burn Pit. Mil Med. 2017 05; 182(5):e1812-e1813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  3. Conventional weaning parameters do not predict extubation failure in neurocritical care patients. Neurocrit Care. 2009; 10(3):269-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  4. Intraventricular nicardipine for refractory cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2008; 8(2):247-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  5. Myocardial injury in acute stroke: a troponin I study. Neurocrit Care. 2004; 1(3):343-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  6. Modified National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale can be estimated from medical records. Stroke. 2003 Feb; 34(2):568-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  7. Safety of air medical transportation after tissue plasminogen activator administration in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999 Nov; 30(11):2366-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  8. Significance of Parenchymal Brain Damage in Patients with Critical Illness. Neurocrit Care. 2015 Oct; 23(2):243-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  9. Comparison of endovascular treatment approaches for acute ischemic stroke: cost effectiveness, technical success, and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Sep; 7(9):666-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. Utilization of CT perfusion patient selection for mechanical thrombectomy irrespective of time: a comparison of functional outcomes and complications. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 Nov; 5(6):518-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  11. Impact of integrated cerebrovascular program on outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013 May; 5(3):264-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  12. CT perfusion-guided patient selection for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is safe and effective. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012 Jul; 4(4):261-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  13. Clinical experience with Matrix2 360 degrees coils in the treatment of 100 intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2009 Jul; 72(1):41-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  14. The safety and efficacy of thrombolysis for strokes after cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Mar 04; 51(9):906-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  15. CT-NIHSS mismatch does not correlate with MRI diffusion-perfusion mismatch. Stroke. 2007 Jul; 38(7):2079-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  16. The association between neurological deficit in acute ischemic stroke and mean transit time: comparison of four different perfusion MRI algorithms. Neuroradiology. 2006 Feb; 48(2):69-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  17. Early and late recurrence of ischemic lesion on MRI: evidence for a prolonged stroke-prone state? Neurology. 2004 Dec 28; 63(12):2261-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Early blood-brain barrier disruption in human focal brain ischemia. Ann Neurol. 2004 Oct; 56(4):468-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Early ischemic lesion recurrence within a week after acute ischemic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2003 Jul; 54(1):66-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  20. Predictors of fatal brain edema in massive hemispheric ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2001 Sep; 32(9):2117-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  21. Automated CT segmentation and analysis for acute middle cerebral artery stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jun-Jul; 22(6):1050-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  22. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records. Stroke. 1999 Aug; 30(8):1534-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.