Connection

Charles Bennett to Medical Oncology

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Charles Bennett has written about Medical Oncology.
Connection Strength

3.152
  1. End of an era for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in oncology. Int J Cancer. 2020 05 15; 146(10):2829-2835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.627
  2. Generic drugs in oncology - Authors' reply. Lancet Oncol. 2017 02; 18(2):e64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  3. The sound and the fury: financial conflicts of interest in oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20; 25(24):3567-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.263
  4. Use of erythropoietin in cancer patients: assessment of oncologists' practice patterns in the United States and other countries. Am J Med. 2004 Jan 01; 116(1):28-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  5. Perspectives on the value of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 01; 21(5):937-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  6. Quality improvement efforts in oncology: are we ready to begin? Cancer Invest. 2001; 19(1):86-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  7. Comparing cost-effectiveness analyses for the clinical oncology setting: the example of the Gynecologic Oncology Group 111 trial. Cancer Invest. 2000; 18(3):261-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  8. Evaluation of conflict of interest in economic analyses of new drugs used in oncology. JAMA. 1999 Oct 20; 282(15):1453-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  9. Caveat Medicus: Clinician experiences in publishing reports of serious oncology-associated adverse drug reactions. PLoS One. 2019; 14(7):e0219521.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  10. A national survey of radiation oncologists and urologists on prediction tools and nomograms for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2019 Oct; 37(10):2099-2108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  11. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and quality of life: personal journeys of a cancer survivor, oncologist, and two cancer health services researchers. Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 29; 111(3):421-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  12. Thromboprophylaxis guidelines in cancer with a primary focus on ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy: a review from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions (SONAR). Semin Thromb Hemost. 2012 Nov; 38(8):759-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  13. Venous thromboembolic disease. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2006 Oct; 4(9):838-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  14. A comparison of ovarian cancer treatments: analysis of utility assessments of ovarian cancer patients, at-risk population, general population, and physicians. Gynecol Oncol. 2004 Apr; 93(1):164-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Purchasing oncology services. Kerr L. White Institute/American Cancer Society Task Force on Purchasing Oncology Services. Cancer. 2000 Jun 15; 88(12):2876-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  16. Does reimbursement affect physician decision making? Cancer Treat Res. 2000; 102:137-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  17. Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: comparison of the 1994 and 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology surveys regarding ASCO clinical practice guidelines. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Nov; 17(11):3676-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  18. The association between physician reimbursement in the US and use of hematopoietic colony stimulating factors as adjunct therapy for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the 1997 American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Ann Oncol. 1999 Nov; 10(11):1355-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  19. Perceptions of cisplatin-related toxicity among ovarian cancer patients and gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Dec; 71(3):369-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  20. Use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: the American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. The Health Services Research Committee of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep; 14(9):2511-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  21. Ensuring comprehensive assessment of urinary problems in prostate cancer through patient-physician concordance. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan; 32(1):26.e25-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  22. Use of epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with cancer: 2007 American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. Blood. 2008 Jan 01; 111(1):25-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  23. 2000 update of recommendations for the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors: evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. American Society of Clinical Oncology Growth Factors Expert Panel. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Oct 15; 18(20):3558-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.