Connection

Daniel Steinberg to Coronary Artery Disease

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Steinberg has written about Coronary Artery Disease.
Connection Strength

2.977
  1. Examining the Relevance of Chronic Coronary Occlusion in Patients Undergoing TAVR. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 10; 21(10):1311-1312.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.470
  2. Computed tomography imaging of coronary artery plaque: characterization and prognosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015 Mar; 53(2):307-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  3. Everolimus-eluting stents in interventional cardiology. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012; 8:393-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.267
  4. Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15; 103(4):491-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  5. Intravascular quantification of coronary calcification - current and future utility. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Nov; 20(11):591.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  6. SCAI expert consensus statement update on best practices for transradial angiography and intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 02; 95(2):245-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  7. Influence of Coronary Calcium on Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning CT-FFR: Results From MACHINE Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 03; 13(3):760-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  8. Correlation and predictive value of aortic root calcification markers with coronary artery calcification and obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiol Med. 2017 Feb; 122(2):113-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  9. Coronary CT angiography-derived quantitative markers for predicting in-stent restenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct; 10(5):377-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  10. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 May-Jun; 10(3):199-206.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  11. Dual-source CT imaging to plan transcatheter aortic valve replacement: accuracy for diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2015 Apr; 275(1):80-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  12. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 01; 114(9):1303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  13. Comparison of lipid deposition at coronary bifurcations versus at nonbifurcation portions of coronary arteries as determined by near-infrared spectroscopy. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Aug 01; 112(3):369-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  14. Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Radiology. 2012 Nov; 265(2):385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  15. Percutaneous coronary intervention with second-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents in United States contemporary practice (REWARDS TLX Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 15; 110(8):1119-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  16. Multimodality direct coronary imaging with combined near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound: initial US experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb; 81(3):551-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  17. Can acute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery produce a typical "takotsubo" left ventricular contraction pattern? Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jul 15; 104(2):202-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  18. Prognostic value of the Syntax score in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Apr 01; 73(5):612-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  19. Requirement for emergent coronary artery bypass surgery following percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Apr 01; 103(7):950-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  20. Comparison of outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in nonostial proximal left anterior descending coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15; 103(4):496-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  21. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary interventions in contemporary practice. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Feb; 102(2):143-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  22. Impact of bivalirudin use on outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Feb; 22(1):61-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  23. The predictive value of computed tomography calcium scores: a comparison with quantitative volumetric intravascular ultrasound. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Jan-Mar; 10(1):30-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  24. Five-year outcomes of moderate or ambiguous left main coronary artery disease and the intravascular ultrasound predictors of events. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 Dec; 20(12):635-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  25. The potential clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug; 29(15):1851-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  26. Drug-eluting stent thrombosis. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2008 Feb; 56(1):127-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  27. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007 Sep 11; 116(11 Suppl):I200-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  28. Impact of "nuisance" bleeding on clopidogrel compliance in patients undergoing intracoronary drug-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 15; 102(12):1614-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.