Connection

Judy Dubno to Middle Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Middle Aged.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
2.006
Middle Aged
  1. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty. Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  2. Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 01; 147(1):273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  3. Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 09 20; 62(9):3554-3563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  4. General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2019 07; 40(6):745-753.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun; 40(3):468-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  6. Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 05 01; 145(5):422-430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  7. Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):EL173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  8. Age-Related Hearing Loss Associations With Changes in Brain Morphology. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec; 23:2331216519857267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  9. Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2018 08; 39(7):e543-e549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  10. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 07; 144(1):267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  11. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 04; 143(4):2232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  12. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids. Laryngoscope. 2018 09; 128(9):2133-2138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 02; 143(2):1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  14. Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec; 22:2331216518797848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  15. Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 10 01; 143(10):975-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  16. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  17. Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 01 01; 60(1):251-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  18. Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions. Otol Neurotol. 2016 12; 37(10):1475-1481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  19. Longitudinal Changes in Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr; 18(2):371-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  20. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 10 01; 59(5):1198-1207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  21. Higher Health Care Costs in Middle-aged US Adults With Hearing Loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 06 01; 142(6):607-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  22. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  23. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Dec; 15(6):945-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  24. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening. Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb; 35(1):72-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  25. Benefits of auditory training for aided listening by older adults. Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec; 22(2):335-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  26. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 14(5):687-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  27. White matter hyperintensities predict low frequency hearing in older adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun; 14(3):425-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  28. Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr; 148(4):664-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  29. Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct; 13(5):703-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  30. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed. Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun; 33(3):330-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  31. Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr; 131(4):EL323-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  33. Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 13(1):91-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  35. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  36. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  37. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  38. Age-related effects on word recognition: reliance on cognitive control systems with structural declines in speech-responsive cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun; 9(2):252-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  39. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  40. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  41. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  42. Estimated Monetary Value of Future Research Clarifying Uncertainties Around the Optimal Adult Hearing Screening Schedule. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Nov 04; 3(11):e224065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  43. Model-Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Hearing Screening in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar; 38(4):978-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  44. Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise. Neuroimage. 2022 06; 253:119042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  45. Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure. J Neurosci. 2021 12 15; 41(50):10293-10304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  46. Auditory brainstem responses in younger and older adults for broadband noises separated by a silent gap. Hear Res. 2001 Nov; 161(1-2):81-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  47. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):32-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  48. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 03 01; 147(3):280-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  49. Atorvastatin is associated with reduced cisplatin-induced hearing loss. J Clin Invest. 2021 01 04; 131(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  50. Evaluating the Relationship Between Olfactory Function and Loneliness in Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 May; 35(3):334-340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  51. Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 07 01; 146(7):613-620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  52. A Community-Based Study on the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020 Sep; 34(5):661-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  53. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25(4):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  54. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  55. Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task. J Neurosci Res. 2020 04; 98(4):680-691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  56. Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank. Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug; 40(4):1016-1024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  57. Age-related differences in olfactory cleft volume in adults: A computational volumetric study. Laryngoscope. 2019 02; 129(2):E55-E60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  58. Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 09 19; 61(9):2422-2430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  59. Communication and Healthcare: Self-Reports of People with Hearing Loss in Primary Care Settings. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Oct-Dec; 42(5):485-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  60. Cognitive persistence: Development and validation of a novel measure from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28; 102:95-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  61. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 40(2):444-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  62. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  63. Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb; 40(1):208-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  64. Effects of Age and Implanted Ear on Speech Recognition in Adults with Unilateral Cochlear Implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2016; 21(4):223-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  65. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  66. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):50-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  67. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):67-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  68. Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr; 38(2):490-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  69. Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when. J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 04; 35(9):3929-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  70. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  71. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  72. Sox10 expressing cells in the lateral wall of the aged mouse and human cochlea. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e97389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  73. Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S45-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  74. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  75. Age-related changes of myelin basic protein in mouse and human auditory nerve. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  76. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  77. Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov; 49(13):3563-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  78. Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun; 22(6):1360-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  79. Guest editorial: accessible and affordable hearing health care for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2010 Feb; 31(1):2-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  80. Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990; 469:23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  81. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: a dependency on low-level auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2009 May 13; 29(19):6078-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  82. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  83. Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jun; 81(6):1940-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  84. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  85. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  86. Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  87. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  88. A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 May; 47(2):114-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  89. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):135-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  90. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):141-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  91. Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug; 106(2):966-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  92. Feasibility of using fMRI to study mothers responding to infant cries. Depress Anxiety. 1999; 10(3):99-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  93. Analysis of blood chemistry and hearing levels in a sample of older persons. Ear Hear. 1998 Jun; 19(3):180-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  94. Gender-specific effects of medicinal drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb; 118(2):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  95. Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan; 103(1):553-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  96. Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998; 48:117-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  97. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  98. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  99. Comparison of speech recognition-in-noise and subjective communication assessment. Ear Hear. 1985 Nov-Dec; 6(6):291-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.