Connection

Judy Dubno to Hearing

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Hearing.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
6.289
Hearing
  1. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 07; 144(1):267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.554
  2. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 04; 143(4):2232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.544
  3. Research Forum on Challenges in Hearing Health Care for the Oldest Older Adults. Am J Audiol. 2015 Jun; 24(2):98-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.447
  4. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Dec; 15(6):945-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.427
  5. Auditory-evoked cortical activity: contribution of brain noise, phase locking, and spectral power. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Sep; 25(3):277-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  6. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  7. Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):253-272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  8. Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 09; 150(3):1979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  9. A Comparison of the Perceived Hearing Difficulties of Community and Clinical Samples of Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 09 14; 64(9):3653-3667.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  10. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):32-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  11. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 03 01; 147(3):280-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  12. Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 12 14; 63(12):4289-4299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  13. Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease. Hear Res. 2021 03 15; 402:108109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  14. Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr; 41(2):451-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  15. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  16. The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb; 41(1):95-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  17. General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2019 07; 40(6):745-753.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  18. Beyond the audiogram: application of models of auditory fitness for duty to assess communication in the real world. Int J Audiol. 2018 05; 57(5):321-322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  19. Beyond the Audiogram: Application of Models of Auditory Fitness for Duty to Assess Communication in the Real World. Ear Hear. 2018 May/Jun; 39(3):434-435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  20. Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 02; 143(2):1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  21. Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct; 140(4):2481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  22. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  23. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  24. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  25. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  26. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  27. Age-related changes of myelin basic protein in mouse and human auditory nerve. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  28. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  29. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  30. Sex-Linked Biology and Gender-Related Research Is Essential to Advancing Hearing Health. Ear Hear. 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):10-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  31. Estimated Monetary Value of Future Research Clarifying Uncertainties Around the Optimal Adult Hearing Screening Schedule. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Nov 04; 3(11):e224065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  32. Model-Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Hearing Screening in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar; 38(4):978-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  33. Investigating the characteristics of genes and variants associated with self-reported hearing difficulty in older adults in the UK Biobank. BMC Biol. 2022 06 27; 20(1):150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  34. Perception of interrupted speech and text: Listener and modality factors. JASA Express Lett. 2022 06; 2(6):064402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  35. Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):273-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  36. Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 10; 150(4):2327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  37. Comparative implementation-effectiveness of three strategies to perform hearing screening among older adults in primary care clinics: study design and protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2020 05 11; 20(1):170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  38. Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec; 24:2331216520945516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  39. Gender-specific effects of drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Nov 28; 884:381-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  40. Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan; 103(1):553-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  41. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  42. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  43. A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 May; 47(2):114-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  44. Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Nov; 100(5):3336-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.