Connection

Judy Dubno to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Aged.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
2.915
Aged
  1. Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 01; 151(1):650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  2. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty. Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  3. Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 09; 150(3):1979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  4. A Comparison of the Perceived Hearing Difficulties of Community and Clinical Samples of Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 09 14; 64(9):3653-3667.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  5. Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 12 14; 63(12):4289-4299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  6. Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease. Hear Res. 2021 03 15; 402:108109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  7. The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb; 41(1):95-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  8. Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 01; 147(1):273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  9. Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec; 24:2331216520915110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  10. Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 09 20; 62(9):3554-3563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  11. General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2019 07; 40(6):745-753.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  12. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun; 40(3):468-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  13. Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 05 01; 145(5):422-430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  14. Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):EL173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  15. Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2018 08; 39(7):e543-e549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  16. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 07; 144(1):267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  17. Healthcare Costs for Insured Older U.S. Adults with Hearing Loss. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 08; 66(8):1546-1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  18. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 04; 143(4):2232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  19. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids. Laryngoscope. 2018 09; 128(9):2133-2138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 02; 143(2):1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec; 22:2331216518797848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  22. Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 10 01; 143(10):975-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  23. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  24. Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing. Neurobiol Aging. 2017 05; 53:150-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  25. Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 01 01; 60(1):251-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  26. Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions. Otol Neurotol. 2016 12; 37(10):1475-1481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  27. Longitudinal Changes in Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr; 18(2):371-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  28. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 10 01; 59(5):1198-1207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  29. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  30. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Dec; 15(6):945-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  31. Auditory-evoked cortical activity: contribution of brain noise, phase locking, and spectral power. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Sep; 25(3):277-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  32. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening. Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb; 35(1):72-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  33. Benefits of auditory training for aided listening by older adults. Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec; 22(2):335-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  34. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 14(5):687-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  35. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun; 34(3):288-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  36. White matter hyperintensities predict low frequency hearing in older adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun; 14(3):425-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  37. Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr; 148(4):664-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  38. Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct; 13(5):703-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  39. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed. Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun; 33(3):330-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  40. Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr; 131(4):EL323-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  41. Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  42. Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 13(1):91-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  43. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  44. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  45. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear. 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  46. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  47. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res. 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  48. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  49. Age-related effects on word recognition: reliance on cognitive control systems with structural declines in speech-responsive cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun; 9(2):252-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  50. Longitudinal changes in speech recognition in older persons. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan; 123(1):462-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  51. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  52. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  53. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hear Res. 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  54. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  55. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  56. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  57. Model-Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Hearing Screening in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar; 38(4):978-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  58. Investigating the characteristics of genes and variants associated with self-reported hearing difficulty in older adults in the UK Biobank. BMC Biol. 2022 06 27; 20(1):150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  59. Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise. Neuroimage. 2022 06; 253:119042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  60. Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):273-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  61. Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure. J Neurosci. 2021 12 15; 41(50):10293-10304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  62. Auditory brainstem responses in younger and older adults for broadband noises separated by a silent gap. Hear Res. 2001 Nov; 161(1-2):81-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  63. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):32-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  64. Atorvastatin is associated with reduced cisplatin-induced hearing loss. J Clin Invest. 2021 01 04; 131(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  65. Evaluating the Relationship Between Olfactory Function and Loneliness in Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 May; 35(3):334-340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  66. Comparative implementation-effectiveness of three strategies to perform hearing screening among older adults in primary care clinics: study design and protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2020 05 11; 20(1):170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  67. A Community-Based Study on the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020 Sep; 34(5):661-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  68. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25(4):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  69. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  70. Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task. J Neurosci Res. 2020 04; 98(4):680-691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  71. Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank. Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug; 40(4):1016-1024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  72. Radiologic changes in the aging nasal cavity. Rhinology. 2019 Apr 01; 57(2):117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  73. Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 09 19; 61(9):2422-2430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  74. Communication and Healthcare: Self-Reports of People with Hearing Loss in Primary Care Settings. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Oct-Dec; 42(5):485-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  75. Cognitive persistence: Development and validation of a novel measure from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28; 102:95-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  76. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 40(2):444-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  77. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  78. Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb; 40(1):208-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  79. Effects of Age and Implanted Ear on Speech Recognition in Adults with Unilateral Cochlear Implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2016; 21(4):223-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  80. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  81. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):50-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  82. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):67-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  83. Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr; 38(2):490-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  84. Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when. J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 04; 35(9):3929-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  85. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  86. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  87. Sox10 expressing cells in the lateral wall of the aged mouse and human cochlea. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e97389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  88. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  89. Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S45-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  90. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  91. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Sep; 23(8):635-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  92. Age-related changes of myelin basic protein in mouse and human auditory nerve. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  93. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  94. Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov; 49(13):3563-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  95. Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun; 22(6):1360-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  96. Guest editorial: accessible and affordable hearing health care for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2010 Feb; 31(1):2-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  97. Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990; 469:23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  98. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: a dependency on low-level auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2009 May 13; 29(19):6078-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  99. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  100. Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jun; 81(6):1940-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  101. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  102. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  103. Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  104. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  105. A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 May; 47(2):114-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  106. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):135-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  107. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):141-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  108. Gender-specific effects of drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Nov 28; 884:381-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  109. Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug; 106(2):966-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  110. Analysis of blood chemistry and hearing levels in a sample of older persons. Ear Hear. 1998 Jun; 19(3):180-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  111. Gender-specific effects of medicinal drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb; 118(2):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  112. Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan; 103(1):553-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  113. Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998; 48:117-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  114. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  115. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  116. Comparison of speech recognition-in-noise and subjective communication assessment. Ear Hear. 1985 Nov-Dec; 6(6):291-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.