Connection

Judy Dubno to Auditory Threshold

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Auditory Threshold.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
6.507
Auditory Threshold
  1. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 04; 143(4):2232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.551
  2. Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec; 22:2331216518797848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.542
  3. Auditory-evoked cortical activity: contribution of brain noise, phase locking, and spectral power. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Sep; 25(3):277-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.430
  4. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 14(5):687-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.395
  5. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  6. Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):253-272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  7. Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 09; 150(3):1979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.175
  8. Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 12 14; 63(12):4289-4299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  9. Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease. Hear Res. 2021 03 15; 402:108109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  10. Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr; 41(2):451-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  11. Age-Related Hearing Loss Associations With Changes in Brain Morphology. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec; 23:2331216519857267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  12. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids. Laryngoscope. 2018 09; 128(9):2133-2138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  13. Complementary metrics of human auditory nerve function derived from compound action potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2018 03 01; 119(3):1019-1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  14. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  15. Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing. Neurobiol Aging. 2017 05; 53:150-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  16. Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct; 140(4):2481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  18. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  19. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Dec; 15(6):945-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  20. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  21. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening. Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb; 35(1):72-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  22. Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL352-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  23. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun; 34(3):288-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  24. Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct; 13(5):703-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  25. Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr; 131(4):EL323-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  26. Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  27. Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 13(1):91-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  28. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  29. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear. 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  30. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  31. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun; 51(3):798-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  32. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res. 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  33. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  34. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  35. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  36. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Ear Hear. 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  37. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hear Res. 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  38. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  39. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  40. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  41. Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):273-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  42. Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure. J Neurosci. 2021 12 15; 41(50):10293-10304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  43. Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 10; 150(4):2327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  44. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):32-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  45. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  46. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25(4):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  47. Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec; 24:2331216520945516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  48. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  49. Comments on the acoustic-reflex response for bone-conducted signals. Acta Otolaryngol. 1978 Jul-Aug; 86(1-2):64-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  50. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 40(2):444-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  51. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  52. Interaction of noise-induced permanent threshold shift and age-related threshold shift. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Mar; 101(3):1681-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  53. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  54. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  55. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  56. Sox10 expressing cells in the lateral wall of the aged mouse and human cochlea. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e97389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  57. Heptanol application to the mouse round window: a model for studying cochlear lateral wall regeneration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr; 150(4):659-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  58. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  59. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  60. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  61. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  62. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  63. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  64. Analysis of blood chemistry and hearing levels in a sample of older persons. Ear Hear. 1998 Jun; 19(3):180-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  65. Gender-specific effects of medicinal drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb; 118(2):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  66. Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998; 48:117-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  67. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  68. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  69. Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils. Hear Res. 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  70. Detection of tones in band-reject noise. J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Sep; 24(3):336-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.