Judy Dubno to Adolescent
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Adolescent.
Connection Strength
0.595
-
General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2019 07; 40(6):745-753.
Score: 0.067
-
Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):EL173.
Score: 0.066
-
Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
Score: 0.057
-
Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 10 01; 59(5):1198-1207.
Score: 0.056
-
Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
Score: 0.051
-
Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL352-8.
Score: 0.045
-
Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9.
Score: 0.032
-
Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun; 51(3):798-813.
Score: 0.031
-
Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res. 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56.
Score: 0.031
-
Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
Score: 0.027
-
Radiologic changes in the aging nasal cavity. Rhinology. 2019 Apr 01; 57(2):117-124.
Score: 0.017
-
Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 09 19; 61(9):2422-2430.
Score: 0.016
-
Communication and Healthcare: Self-Reports of People with Hearing Loss in Primary Care Settings. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Oct-Dec; 42(5):485-494.
Score: 0.015
-
Effects of Age and Implanted Ear on Speech Recognition in Adults with Unilateral Cochlear Implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2016; 21(4):223-230.
Score: 0.014
-
Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S45-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
Score: 0.010
-
Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov; 49(13):3563-72.
Score: 0.010
-
Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64.
Score: 0.010
-
Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
Score: 0.008
-
Auditory brain stem evoked response characteristics in the full-term newborn infant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987 Mar-Apr; 96(2 Pt 1):142-51.
Score: 0.007
-
Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103.
Score: 0.005
-
A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 May; 47(2):114-23.
Score: 0.005
-
Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan; 103(1):553-65.
Score: 0.004