Connection

Judy Dubno to Audiometry, Pure-Tone

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Audiometry, Pure-Tone.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
2.221
Audiometry, Pure-Tone
  1. Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr; 41(2):451-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  2. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun; 40(3):468-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  3. Age-Related Hearing Loss Associations With Changes in Brain Morphology. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec; 23:2331216519857267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  4. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids. Laryngoscope. 2018 09; 128(9):2133-2138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  5. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  6. Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 01 01; 60(1):251-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  7. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  8. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 14(5):687-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  9. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  10. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear. 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  11. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun; 51(3):798-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  12. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  13. Longitudinal changes in speech recognition in older persons. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan; 123(1):462-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  14. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  15. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  16. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Ear Hear. 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  17. Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  18. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  19. Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 07 01; 146(7):613-620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  20. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25(4):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  21. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  22. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 40(2):444-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  23. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  24. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  25. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  26. Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr; 38(2):490-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  27. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  28. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  29. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  30. Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S45-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  31. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  33. Analysis of blood chemistry and hearing levels in a sample of older persons. Ear Hear. 1998 Jun; 19(3):180-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. Gender-specific effects of medicinal drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb; 118(2):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.