Connection

Judy Dubno to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Humans.
Judy Dubno
Connection Strength
2.019
Humans
  1. Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System. Laryngoscope. 2022 11; 132 Suppl 12:S1-S13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  2. Understanding Patient Expectations Before Implantation Using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-Expectations Instrument. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 09 01; 148(9):870-878.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  3. Metabolic and Sensory Components of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):253-272.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  4. Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 01; 151(1):650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  5. Unique patterns of hearing loss and cognition in older adults' neural responses to cues for speech recognition difficulty. Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Jan; 227(1):203-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  6. Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 09; 150(3):1979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  7. A Comparison of the Perceived Hearing Difficulties of Community and Clinical Samples of Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 09 14; 64(9):3653-3667.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  8. Role of Preoperative Patient Expectations in Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2021 02 01; 42(2):e130-e136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  9. Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 12 14; 63(12):4289-4299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  10. Translational and interdisciplinary insights into presbyacusis: A multidimensional disease. Hear Res. 2021 03 15; 402:108109.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Mar/Apr; 41(2):451-460.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  12. The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults. Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb; 41(1):95-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 01; 147(1):273.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec; 24:2331216520915110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  15. Development and Refinement of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing: A Brief Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Am J Audiol. 2019 Oct 16; 28(3S):806-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  16. Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 09 20; 62(9):3554-3563.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  17. General Health Quality of Life Instruments Underestimate the Impact of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2019 07; 40(6):745-753.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  18. Time From Hearing Aid Candidacy to Hearing Aid Adoption: A Longitudinal Cohort Study. Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun; 40(3):468-476.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  19. Association of Demographic and Hearing-Related Factors With Cochlear Implant-Related Quality of Life. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 05 01; 145(5):422-430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  20. Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker. J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 03; 145(3):EL173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  21. Age-Related Hearing Loss Associations With Changes in Brain Morphology. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec; 23:2331216519857267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  22. Earphone and Aided Word Recognition Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates. Otol Neurotol. 2018 08; 39(7):e543-e549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  23. Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 07; 144(1):267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  24. Healthcare Costs for Insured Older U.S. Adults with Hearing Loss. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 08; 66(8):1546-1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  25. Beyond the audiogram: application of models of auditory fitness for duty to assess communication in the real world. Int J Audiol. 2018 05; 57(5):321-322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  26. Amplitude modulation detection with a short-duration carrier: Effects of a precursor and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 04; 143(4):2232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  27. Factors associated with benefit of active middle ear implants compared to conventional hearing aids. Laryngoscope. 2018 09; 128(9):2133-2138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  28. Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 02; 143(2):1085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  29. Meta-analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated With General Health-related Patient-reported Outcome Measures. Otol Neurotol. 2018 01; 39(1):29-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  30. Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss. Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec; 22:2331216518797848.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  31. Complementary metrics of human auditory nerve function derived from compound action potentials. J Neurophysiol. 2018 03 01; 119(3):1019-1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  32. Use of Adult Patient Focus Groups to Develop the Initial Item Bank for a Cochlear Implant Quality-of-Life Instrument. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 10 01; 143(10):975-982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  33. Meta-analysis of quality-of-life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities. Laryngoscope. 2018 04; 128(4):982-990.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  34. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  35. Age-related deficits in auditory temporal processing: unique contributions of neural dyssynchrony and slowed neuronal processing. Neurobiol Aging. 2017 05; 53:150-158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  36. Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 01 01; 60(1):251-262.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  37. Clinical Implications of Word Recognition Differences in Earphone and Aided Conditions. Otol Neurotol. 2016 12; 37(10):1475-1481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  38. Effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Dec; 140(6):4142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  39. Longitudinal Changes in Audiometric Phenotypes of Age-Related Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr; 18(2):371-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  40. Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 10 01; 59(5):1198-1207.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  41. Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct; 140(4):2481.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  42. Higher Health Care Costs in Middle-aged US Adults With Hearing Loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 06 01; 142(6):607-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  43. Research Forum on Challenges in Hearing Health Care for the Oldest Older Adults. Am J Audiol. 2015 Jun; 24(2):98-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  44. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  45. Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Dec; 15(6):945-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  46. Auditory-evoked cortical activity: contribution of brain noise, phase locking, and spectral power. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2014 Sep; 25(3):277-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  47. Computational model predictions of cues for concurrent vowel identification. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2014 Oct; 15(5):823-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  48. Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening. Ear Hear. 2014 Jan-Feb; 35(1):72-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  49. Benefits of auditory training for aided listening by older adults. Am J Audiol. 2013 Dec; 22(2):335-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  50. Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL352-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  51. Classifying human audiometric phenotypes of age-related hearing loss from animal models. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct; 14(5):687-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  52. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun; 34(3):288-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  53. White matter hyperintensities predict low frequency hearing in older adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Jun; 14(3):425-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  54. Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Apr; 148(4):664-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  55. Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Dec; 13(6):835-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  56. Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Oct; 13(5):703-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  57. Human evoked cortical activity to silent gaps in noise: effects of age, attention, and cortical processing speed. Ear Hear. 2012 May-Jun; 33(3):330-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  58. Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr; 131(4):EL323-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  59. Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  60. Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 13(1):91-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  61. Effects of consonant-vowel intensity ratio on loudness of monosyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov; 128(5):3105-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  62. Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  63. At the heart of the ventral attention system: the right anterior insula. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Aug; 30(8):2530-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  64. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS. Ear Hear. 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  65. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Dec; 124(6):3841-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  66. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Jun; 51(3):798-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  67. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res. 2008 Sep; 243(1-2):47-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  68. Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  69. Age-related effects on word recognition: reliance on cognitive control systems with structural declines in speech-responsive cortex. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2008 Jun; 9(2):252-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  70. Longitudinal changes in speech recognition in older persons. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan; 123(1):462-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  71. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  72. Frequency modulation detection: effects of age, psychophysical method, and modulation waveform. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul; 122(1):467-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  73. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Ear Hear. 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  74. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults. Hear Res. 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  75. Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  76. Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  77. Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  78. Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  79. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  80. Patient-Related Factors Do Not Predict Use of Computer-Based Auditory Training by New Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2023 02 01; 44(2):e81-e87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  81. Sex-Linked Biology and Gender-Related Research Is Essential to Advancing Hearing Health. Ear Hear. 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):10-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  82. Estimated Monetary Value of Future Research Clarifying Uncertainties Around the Optimal Adult Hearing Screening Schedule. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Nov 04; 3(11):e224065.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  83. Model-Projected Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Hearing Screening in the USA. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar; 38(4):978-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  84. Normative Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global Scores for Experienced Cochlear Implant Users from a Multi-Institutional Study. Otol Neurotol. 2022 08 01; 43(7):797-802.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  85. Unsupervised Clustering of Olfactory Phenotypes. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2022 Nov; 36(6):796-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  86. Investigating the characteristics of genes and variants associated with self-reported hearing difficulty in older adults in the UK Biobank. BMC Biol. 2022 06 27; 20(1):150.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  87. Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise. Neuroimage. 2022 06; 253:119042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  88. Use of Auditory Training and Its Influence on Early Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Adults. Otol Neurotol. 2022 02 01; 43(2):e165-e173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  89. Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant Candidacy. Audiol Neurootol. 2022; 27(3):235-242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  90. Evidence for Loss of Activity in Low-Spontaneous-Rate Auditory Nerve Fibers of Older Adults. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 04; 23(2):273-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  91. Neural Presbyacusis in Humans Inferred from Age-Related Differences in Auditory Nerve Function and Structure. J Neurosci. 2021 12 15; 41(50):10293-10304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  92. Auditory brainstem responses in younger and older adults for broadband noises separated by a silent gap. Hear Res. 2001 Nov; 161(1-2):81-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  93. Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 10; 150(4):2327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  94. Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments. Ear Hear. 2021 July/Aug; 42(4):896-908.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  95. The amplitude-modulation following response in young and aged human subjects. Hear Res. 2001 Mar; 153(1-2):32-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  96. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 03 01; 147(3):280-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  97. Atorvastatin is associated with reduced cisplatin-induced hearing loss. J Clin Invest. 2021 01 04; 131(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  98. Evaluating the Relationship Between Olfactory Function and Loneliness in Community-Dwelling Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2021 May; 35(3):334-340.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  99. Association of Patient-Related Factors With Adult Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 07 01; 146(7):613-620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  100. Comparative implementation-effectiveness of three strategies to perform hearing screening among older adults in primary care clinics: study design and protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2020 05 11; 20(1):170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  101. A Community-Based Study on the Prevalence of Olfactory Dysfunction. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2020 Sep; 34(5):661-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  102. Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures. Audiol Neurootol. 2020; 25(4):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  103. Factors Influencing Time to Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2020 02; 41(2):173-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  104. Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  105. Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information. Trends Hear. 2020 Jan-Dec; 24:2331216520945516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  106. Cingulo-opercular adaptive control for younger and older adults during a challenging gap detection task. J Neurosci Res. 2020 04; 98(4):680-691.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  107. Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank. Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug; 40(4):1016-1024.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  108. Radiologic changes in the aging nasal cavity. Rhinology. 2019 Apr 01; 57(2):117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  109. Age-related differences in olfactory cleft volume in adults: A computational volumetric study. Laryngoscope. 2019 02; 129(2):E55-E60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  110. Reliability of Measures of N1 Peak Amplitude of the Compound Action Potential in Younger and Older Adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 09 19; 61(9):2422-2430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  111. Whole exome sequencing in adult-onset hearing loss reveals a high load of predicted pathogenic variants in known deafness-associated genes and identifies new candidate genes. BMC Med Genomics. 2018 Sep 04; 11(1):77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  112. Communication and Healthcare: Self-Reports of People with Hearing Loss in Primary Care Settings. Clin Gerontol. 2019 Oct-Dec; 42(5):485-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  113. Novel Radiographic Assessment of the Cribriform Plate. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018 May; 32(3):175-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  114. Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise. Neuroimage. 2017 08 15; 157:381-387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  115. Cognitive persistence: Development and validation of a novel measure from the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28; 102:95-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  116. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr; 40(2):444-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  117. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  118. Extended high-frequency thresholds in older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Feb; 40(1):208-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  119. Effects of Age and Implanted Ear on Speech Recognition in Adults with Unilateral Cochlear Implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2016; 21(4):223-230.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  120. Placement of observations for the efficient estimation of a psychometric function. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jun; 99(6):3689-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  121. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  122. Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):50-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  123. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss. Exp Aging Res. 2016; 42(1):67-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  124. Tinnitus: Research supported by the Tinnitus Research Consortium. Hear Res. 2016 04; 334:1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  125. Confidence limits for maximum word-recognition scores. J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Apr; 38(2):490-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  126. Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  127. Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when. J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 04; 35(9):3929-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  128. Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  129. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  130. Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. Psychophysiology. 2014 Oct; 51(10):1046-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  131. Sox10 expressing cells in the lateral wall of the aged mouse and human cochlea. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6):e97389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  132. Heptanol application to the mouse round window: a model for studying cochlear lateral wall regeneration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr; 150(4):659-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  133. The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit. J Neurosci. 2013 Nov 27; 33(48):18979-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  134. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  135. Audition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12; 80(11 Suppl 3):S45-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  136. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology. 2013 Jan; 50(1):23-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  137. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Sep; 23(8):635-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  138. Age-related changes of myelin basic protein in mouse and human auditory nerve. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e34500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  139. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  140. Inferior frontal sensitivity to common speech sounds is amplified by increasing word intelligibility. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov; 49(13):3563-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  141. Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jun; 22(6):1360-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  142. Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  143. Guest editorial: accessible and affordable hearing health care for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2010 Feb; 31(1):2-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  144. Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990; 469:23-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  145. Speech recognition in younger and older adults: a dependency on low-level auditory cortex. J Neurosci. 2009 May 13; 29(19):6078-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  146. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  147. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan; 85(1):347-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  148. Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan; 85(1):355-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  149. Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Nov; 82(5):1503-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  150. Effects of hearing loss on utilization of short-duration spectral cues in stop consonant recognition. J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Jun; 81(6):1940-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  151. Auditory brain stem evoked response characteristics in developing infants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987 May-Jun; 96(3 Pt 1):291-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  152. Auditory brain stem evoked response characteristics in the full-term newborn infant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987 Mar-Apr; 96(2 Pt 1):142-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  153. Log-linear modeling of consonant confusion data. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986 Feb; 79(2):518-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  154. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  155. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  156. Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test. J Speech Hear Disord. 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  157. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  158. A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982 May; 47(2):114-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  159. A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behavior. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Mar 15; 51(6):431-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  160. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):135-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  161. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns. J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Mar; 25(1):141-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  162. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis. J Acoust Soc Am. 1981 Jan; 69(1):249-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  163. Experience with a yes-no single-interval maximum-likelihood procedure. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2674-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  164. Gender-specific effects of drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Nov 28; 884:381-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  165. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  166. Psychometric functions for gap detection in noise measured from young and aged subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug; 106(2):966-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  167. Feasibility of using fMRI to study mothers responding to infant cries. Depress Anxiety. 1999; 10(3):99-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  168. Comments on the acoustic-reflex response for bone-conducted signals. Acta Otolaryngol. 1978 Jul-Aug; 86(1-2):64-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  169. Analysis of blood chemistry and hearing levels in a sample of older persons. Ear Hear. 1998 Jun; 19(3):180-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  170. Gender-specific effects of medicinal drugs on hearing levels of older persons. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 Feb; 118(2):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  171. Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum-likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan; 103(1):553-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  172. Interaction of noise-induced hearing loss and presbyacusis. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998; 48:117-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  173. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  174. Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Nov; 100(5):3336-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  175. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  176. Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils. Hear Res. 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):1-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  177. Comparison of speech recognition-in-noise and subjective communication assessment. Ear Hear. 1985 Nov-Dec; 6(6):291-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  178. Detection of tones in band-reject noise. J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Sep; 24(3):336-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  179. Speech recognition performance at loudness discomfort level. Scand Audiol. 1981; 10(4):239-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  180. Acoustic-reflex thresholds for noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 1980 Sep; 68(3):892-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.