Judy Dubno to Perceptual Masking
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Judy Dubno has written about Perceptual Masking.
Connection Strength
6.941
-
Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 02; 143(2):1085.
Score: 0.557
-
Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 02; 141(2):1133.
Score: 0.520
-
Glimpsing Speech in the Presence of Nonsimultaneous Amplitude Modulations From a Competing Talker: Effect of Modulation Rate, Age, and Hearing Loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 10 01; 59(5):1198-1207.
Score: 0.508
-
Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501.
Score: 0.463
-
Perceived listening effort for a tonal task with contralateral competing signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL352-8.
Score: 0.413
-
Individual and level-dependent differences in masking for adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Apr; 131(4):EL323-8.
Score: 0.372
-
Level-dependent changes in detection of temporal gaps in noise markers by adults with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov; 130(5):2928-38.
Score: 0.361
-
Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb; 13(1):91-108.
Score: 0.358
-
Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 01; 264(1-2):21-9.
Score: 0.313
-
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Ear Hear. 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93.
Score: 0.271
-
Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Ear Hear. 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17.
Score: 0.260
-
Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug; 118(2):914-22.
Score: 0.234
-
Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Aug; 118(2):923-33.
Score: 0.234
-
Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2084-94.
Score: 0.199
-
Comparing Speech Recognition for Listeners With Normal and Impaired Hearing: Simulations for Controlling Differences in Speech Levels and Spectral Shape. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 12 14; 63(12):4289-4299.
Score: 0.169
-
Sentence perception in noise by hearing-aid users predicted by syllable-constituent perception and the use of context. J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 01; 147(1):273.
Score: 0.159
-
Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 07; 144(1):267.
Score: 0.143
-
Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 04; 141(4):2933.
Score: 0.131
-
Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Oct; 140(4):2481.
Score: 0.127
-
Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203.
Score: 0.122
-
Masked thresholds and consonant recognition in low-pass maskers for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Apr; 97(4):2430-41.
Score: 0.114
-
Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Mar; 137(3):1336-43.
Score: 0.114
-
Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30.
Score: 0.101
-
Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21.
Score: 0.093
-
Frequency selectivity for hearing-impaired and broadband-noise-masked normal listeners. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Aug; 43(3):543-64.
Score: 0.089
-
Binaural advantage for younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Apr; 51(2):539-56.
Score: 0.070
-
Spectral and threshold effects on recognition of speech at higher-than-normal levels. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Jul; 120(1):310-20.
Score: 0.062
-
Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96.
Score: 0.054
-
Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310.
Score: 0.049
-
Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907.
Score: 0.047
-
Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise. Neuroimage. 2022 06; 253:119042.
Score: 0.046
-
Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Jan; 107(1):538-46.
Score: 0.040
-
Masking by ipsilateral and contralateral maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Nov; 100(5):3336-44.
Score: 0.032
-
Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24.
Score: 0.030
-
Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74.
Score: 0.028
-
Associations among frequency and temporal resolution and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990; 469:23-9.
Score: 0.020
-
Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75.
Score: 0.019
-
Detection of tones in band-reject noise. J Speech Hear Res. 1981 Sep; 24(3):336-44.
Score: 0.011
-
Masking of auditory brainstem responses in young and aged gerbils. Hear Res. 1995 Sep; 89(1-2):1-13.
Score: 0.007