Connection

Etta Pisano to Mass Screening

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Mass Screening.
Etta Pisano
Connection Strength
3.575
Mass Screening
  1. How Radiologists Can Improve Breast Cancer Screening. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):295-297.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.499
  2. Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection. Radiology. 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  3. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr; 108(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.332
  4. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.258
  5. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Radiology. 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  6. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  7. Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jan 20; 9:4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  8. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  9. American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology. 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  10. Issues in breast cancer screening. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Feb; 4(1):5-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  11. Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  12. AI shows promise for breast cancer screening. Nature. 2020 01; 577(7788):35-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  13. Risk-Based Screening Mammography for Women Aged <40: Outcomes From the National Mammography Database. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):368-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  14. The politics of mammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  15. Implementation of breast cancer screening. Curr Opin Radiol. 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  16. Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology. 2010 Jan; 254(1):79-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  17. Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010; 2010(41):142-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. A limitation of ACRIN DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):702; author reply 702-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  19. DMIST results: technologic or observer variability? Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  20. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 01; 148(1):1-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  21. Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):553-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  22. Digital mammography: what next? J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  23. Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  24. Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial--an update. Acad Radiol. 2002 Mar; 9(3):374-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  25. Current status of full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2000 Jan; 214(1):26-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  26. A program to control breast and cervical cancer in North Carolina. N C Med J. 1998 Mar-Apr; 59(2):110-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. Breast imaging fellowship programs. A survey of the fellows of the Society of Breast Imaging. Invest Radiol. 1994 Apr; 29(4):415-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  28. Issues in mammography. Cancer. 1990 Sep 15; 66(6 Suppl):1341-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  29. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14; 299(18):2151-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  30. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005 May 01; 103(9):1898-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  31. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.