Etta Pisano to Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Image Processing, Computer-Assisted.
Connection Strength
1.229
-
Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct; 20(5):1479-91.
Score: 0.136
-
Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography. Radiology. 2000 Mar; 214(3):895-901.
Score: 0.131
-
Current status of full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2000 Jan; 214(1):26-8.
Score: 0.129
-
Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 1998 Nov; 11(4):193-200.
Score: 0.119
-
The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting. J Digit Imaging. 1997 Nov; 10(4):174-82.
Score: 0.111
-
Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms? J Digit Imaging. 1997 May; 10(2):79-84.
Score: 0.108
-
Virtual environments technology to aid needle biopsies of the breast. An example of real-time data fusion. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996; 29:60-1.
Score: 0.098
-
Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep; 45(5):813-30, vi.
Score: 0.055
-
Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1344-54.
Score: 0.052
-
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
Score: 0.047
-
Digital mammography. Radiology. 2005 Feb; 234(2):353-62.
Score: 0.046
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology. 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60.
Score: 0.040
-
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):483-8.
Score: 0.038
-
Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):861-9, x.
Score: 0.034
-
A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications. J Digit Imaging. 1997 Feb; 10(1):14-20.
Score: 0.026
-
Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9.
Score: 0.022
-
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50.
Score: 0.013
-
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53.
Score: 0.012
-
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86.
Score: 0.011