Etta Pisano to X-Ray Film
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about X-Ray Film.
Connection Strength
1.124
-
Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1168-74.
Score: 0.347
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83.
Score: 0.294
-
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2009 Apr; 251(1):41-9.
Score: 0.080
-
A limitation of ACRIN DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):702; author reply 702-3.
Score: 0.076
-
DMIST results: technologic or observer variability? Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703.
Score: 0.076
-
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
Score: 0.067
-
Digital mammography: what next? J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5.
Score: 0.066
-
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):483-8.
Score: 0.049
-
Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality. Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70.
Score: 0.041
-
Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9.
Score: 0.021
-
Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9.
Score: 0.007