Etta Pisano to North Carolina
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about North Carolina.
Connection Strength
0.550
-
Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1168-74.
Score: 0.085
-
Insurance status and the severity of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct; 15(10):1255-8.
Score: 0.076
-
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
Score: 0.056
-
Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy. Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun; 10(6):601-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):864-70.
Score: 0.046
-
Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr; 174(4):1089-91.
Score: 0.042
-
Educational outreach to mammography facility staff to assist with compliance with the Mammography Quality Standards Act in rural North Carolina. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jul; 5(7):485-90.
Score: 0.037
-
Patient compliance in mobile screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1995 Dec; 2(12):1067-72.
Score: 0.031
-
A formal curriculum in breast imaging for radiology residents. Invest Radiol. 1993 Aug; 28(8):762-6.
Score: 0.026
-
Research for North Carolina: The University Cancer Research Fund. N C Med J. 2008 Jul-Aug; 69(4):299-302.
Score: 0.019
-
Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91.
Score: 0.017
-
Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
Score: 0.016
-
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
Score: 0.016
-
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Acad Radiol. 2002 Dec; 9(12):1378-82.
Score: 0.013
-
A program to control breast and cervical cancer in North Carolina. N C Med J. 1998 Mar-Apr; 59(2):110-4.
Score: 0.009
-
Real-time radiologist review of remote ultrasound using low-cost video and voice. Invest Radiol. 1993 Aug; 28(8):732-4.
Score: 0.007