Etta Pisano to Algorithms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Algorithms.
Connection Strength
0.561
-
Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct; 20(5):1479-91.
Score: 0.116
-
Big Data and Radiology Research. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Sep; 16(9 Pt B):1347-1350.
Score: 0.108
-
MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 07; 46(1):290-302.
Score: 0.090
-
Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51.
Score: 0.057
-
Mass density images from the diffraction enhanced imaging technique. Med Phys. 2005 Feb; 32(2):549-52.
Score: 0.039
-
Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):845-55.
Score: 0.031
-
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30.
Score: 0.029
-
A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):161-71.
Score: 0.019
-
Automated delineation of calcified vessels in mammography by tracking with uncertainty and graphical linking techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov; 31(11):2143-55.
Score: 0.017
-
Detection of arterial calcification in mammograms by random walks. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2009; 21:713-24.
Score: 0.013
-
Computation of mass-density images from x-ray refraction-angle images. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 07; 51(7):1769-78.
Score: 0.011
-
Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. Med Phys. 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36.
Score: 0.011
-
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53.
Score: 0.010
-
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
Score: 0.010