Etta Pisano to Breast Diseases
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Breast Diseases.
Connection Strength
1.179
-
Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
Score: 0.205
-
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):483-8.
Score: 0.192
-
Current status of full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2000 Apr; 7(4):266-80.
Score: 0.166
-
Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation: a critique. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jul; 5(7):513-5; discussion 516.
Score: 0.147
-
Automated delineation of calcified vessels in mammography by tracking with uncertainty and graphical linking techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov; 31(11):2143-55.
Score: 0.098
-
Detection of arterial calcification in mammograms by random walks. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2009; 21:713-24.
Score: 0.076
-
Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2004 Aug 07; 49(15):3427-39.
Score: 0.056
-
Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):864-70.
Score: 0.046
-
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30.
Score: 0.043
-
Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct; 20(5):1479-91.
Score: 0.043
-
Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality. Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70.
Score: 0.040
-
Future directions in imaging of breast diseases. Radiology. 1998 Feb; 206(2):297-300.
Score: 0.036
-
Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up. Acad Radiol. 2006 May; 13(5):621-9.
Score: 0.016
-
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
Score: 0.015