Etta Pisano to X-Ray Intensifying Screens
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about X-Ray Intensifying Screens.
Connection Strength
0.463
-
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep; 199(3):W392-401.
Score: 0.101
-
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48.
Score: 0.075
-
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50.
Score: 0.066
-
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Med Phys. 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50.
Score: 0.063
-
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86.
Score: 0.058
-
Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality. Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70.
Score: 0.041
-
Diffraction-enhanced imaging of musculoskeletal tissues using a conventional x-ray tube. Acad Radiol. 2009 Aug; 16(8):918-23.
Score: 0.020
-
Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. Med Phys. 2006 Mar; 33(3):719-36.
Score: 0.016
-
Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial. Med Phys. 2006 Mar; 33(3):737-52.
Score: 0.016
-
Effects of delayed processing on mammographic phantom object detection. Invest Radiol. 1993 Dec; 28(12):1113-9.
Score: 0.007