Connection

Etta Pisano to Adult

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Adult.
Etta Pisano
Connection Strength
0.603
Adult
  1. Risk-Based Screening Mammography for Women Aged <40: Outcomes From the National Mammography Database. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):368-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  2. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr; 108(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct; 203(4):909-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  4. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  5. Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Radiology. 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010; 2010(41):142-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  7. Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  8. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  9. Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr; 188(4):897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  10. Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1344-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  11. Digital mammography: what next? J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  12. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27; 353(17):1773-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  13. Digital mammography. Radiology. 2005 Feb; 234(2):353-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  14. Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a suspicious breast mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun; 180(6):1740-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  15. Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy. Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun; 10(6):601-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  16. Embolization coils as tumor markers for mammography in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan; 174(1):251-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  17. MRI, Clinical Examination, and Mammography for Preoperative Assessment of Residual Disease and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6657 Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jun; 210(6):1376-1385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  18. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer. 1998 Feb 15; 82(4):679-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  19. Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogram. Cancer Detect Prev. 1998; 22(2):161-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  20. MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 07; 46(1):290-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Ultrasound and MR findings in acute Budd-Chiari syndrome with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Sep-Oct; 20(5):819-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Patient compliance in mobile screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1995 Dec; 2(12):1067-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL. Radiology. 2016 Apr; 279(1):44-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology. 2012 Jun; 263(3):663-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  25. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012 Apr 04; 307(13):1394-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan; 198(1):219-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 2012 Apr 15; 118(8):2021-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011 Jan; 258(1):59-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Issues in mammography. Cancer. 1990 Sep 15; 66(6 Suppl):1341-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  31. A limitation of ACRIN DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):702; author reply 702-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. DMIST results: technologic or observer variability? Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  33. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14; 299(18):2151-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  34. Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  35. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 01; 148(1):1-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  36. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology. 2007 Aug; 244(2):381-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  37. Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  38. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  39. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jun; 54(3):365-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  41. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005 May 01; 103(9):1898-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  42. Low-dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary study. Clin Imaging. 2005 May-Jun; 29(3):172-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  43. Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 10; 23(8):1674-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  44. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004 Dec 08; 292(22):2735-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  45. Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  46. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  47. Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects? Acad Radiol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):1257-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  48. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 May; 22(5):491-7; quiz 498-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  49. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Acad Radiol. 2002 Dec; 9(12):1378-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. First human experience with pulmonary vein isolation using a through-the-balloon circumferential ultrasound ablation system for recurrent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000 Oct 17; 102(16):1879-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  51. Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographer's opinions. Acad Radiol. 2000 May; 7(5):335-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  52. A program to control breast and cervical cancer in North Carolina. N C Med J. 1998 Mar-Apr; 59(2):110-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  53. A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications. J Digit Imaging. 1997 Feb; 10(1):14-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  54. Late occlusion of aortofemoral bypass graft: surgical treatment. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Dec; 2(6):763-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  55. Computed tomography interpretations with a low-cost workstation: a timing study. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Aug; 7(3):133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  56. Cerebral SPECT with 99mTc-HMPAO in extracranial carotid pathology: evaluation of changes in the ischemic area after carotid endarterectomy. Int Angiol. 1992 Apr-Jun; 11(2):117-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  57. Carotid endarterectomy in young adults. Int Angiol. 1991 Oct-Dec; 10(4):220-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.