Etta Pisano to Female
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Etta Pisano has written about Female.
Connection Strength
1.278
-
How Radiologists Can Improve Breast Cancer Screening. Radiology. 2022 02; 302(2):295-297.
Score: 0.041
-
RE: Advanced Breast Cancer Definitions by Staging System Examined in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 07 01; 113(7):938-939.
Score: 0.040
-
Risk-Based Screening Mammography for Women Aged <40: Outcomes From the National Mammography Database. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):368-376.
Score: 0.036
-
Big Data and Radiology Research. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Sep; 16(9 Pt B):1347-1350.
Score: 0.035
-
Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 09 01; 109(9).
Score: 0.031
-
Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program--Evidence that Direct Radiography Is Superior to Computed Radiography for Cancer Detection. Radiology. 2016 Feb; 278(2):311-2.
Score: 0.028
-
Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr; 108(4).
Score: 0.027
-
Tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening. Clin Imaging. 2016 Mar-Apr; 40(2):283-7.
Score: 0.027
-
Impact of computer-aided detection systems on radiologist accuracy with digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Oct; 203(4):909-16.
Score: 0.025
-
Breast cancer screening: should tomosynthesis replace digital mammography? JAMA. 2014 Jun 25; 311(24):2488-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jun; 174(6):954-61.
Score: 0.025
-
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep; 199(3):W392-401.
Score: 0.022
-
Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22.
Score: 0.021
-
Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Radiology. 2011 Jul; 260(1):61-7.
Score: 0.020
-
Mode of detection and secular time for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010; 2010(41):142-4.
Score: 0.018
-
Effect of breast compression on lesion characteristic visibility with diffraction-enhanced imaging. Acad Radiol. 2010 Apr; 17(4):433-40.
Score: 0.018
-
Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
Score: 0.018
-
Insurance status and the severity of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 2008 Oct; 15(10):1255-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Feb; 246(2):376-83.
Score: 0.016
-
Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee. Radiology. 2007 Oct; 245(1):12-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep; 45(5):813-30, vi.
Score: 0.015
-
Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography. Acad Radiol. 2007 Jun; 14(6):670-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):553-60.
Score: 0.015
-
Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr; 188(4):897-900.
Score: 0.015
-
Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1344-54.
Score: 0.015
-
Digital mammography: what next? J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):583-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):589-608.
Score: 0.014
-
Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):609-14.
Score: 0.014
-
Digital mammography image quality: image display. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27.
Score: 0.014
-
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27; 353(17):1773-83.
Score: 0.013
-
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology. Radiology. 2005 Aug; 236(2):404-12.
Score: 0.013
-
Digital mammography. Radiology. 2005 Feb; 234(2):353-62.
Score: 0.013
-
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
Score: 0.012
-
Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a suspicious breast mass. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun; 180(6):1740-2.
Score: 0.011
-
Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsy. Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun; 10(6):601-6.
Score: 0.011
-
Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
Score: 0.011
-
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology. 2002 May; 223(2):483-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial--an update. Acad Radiol. 2002 Mar; 9(3):374-5.
Score: 0.011
-
Linking Structural Racism and Discrimination and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Social Genomics Approach. J Clin Oncol. 2022 05 01; 40(13):1407-1413.
Score: 0.010
-
Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):845-55.
Score: 0.010
-
Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Acad Radiol. 2001 Sep; 8(9):864-70.
Score: 0.010
-
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group V. Radiology. 2001 Jun; 219(3):785-92.
Score: 0.010
-
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30.
Score: 0.010
-
Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000 Sep-Oct; 20(5):1479-91.
Score: 0.010
-
Digital mammography, sestamibi breast scintigraphy, and positron emission tomography breast imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):861-9, x.
Score: 0.009
-
Multi-Institutional Assessment and Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Deep Learning for Automated Classification of Breast Density. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Dec; 17(12):1653-1662.
Score: 0.009
-
Discrimination of benign from malignant breast lesions in dense breasts with model-based analysis of regions-of-interest using directional diffusion-weighted images. BMC Med Imaging. 2020 06 09; 20(1):61.
Score: 0.009
-
Current status of full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2000 Apr; 7(4):266-80.
Score: 0.009
-
Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiography. Radiology. 2000 Mar; 214(3):895-901.
Score: 0.009
-
Embolization coils as tumor markers for mammography in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for carcinoma of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jan; 174(1):251-2.
Score: 0.009
-
Current status of full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2000 Jan; 214(1):26-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms. Med Phys. 1999 Nov; 26(11):2266-72.
Score: 0.009
-
Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality. Acad Radiol. 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70.
Score: 0.009
-
Diagnosis please. Case 8: solitary intraductal papilloma. Radiology. 1999 Mar; 210(3):795-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms. J Digit Imaging. 1998 Nov; 11(4):193-200.
Score: 0.008
-
Screening behavior of women after a false-positive mammogram. Radiology. 1998 Jul; 208(1):245-9.
Score: 0.008
-
Educational outreach to mammography facility staff to assist with compliance with the Mammography Quality Standards Act in rural North Carolina. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jul; 5(7):485-90.
Score: 0.008
-
Advanced breast biopsy instrumentation: a critique. Acad Radiol. 1998 Jul; 5(7):513-5; discussion 516.
Score: 0.008
-
MRI, Clinical Examination, and Mammography for Preoperative Assessment of Residual Disease and Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6657 Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jun; 210(6):1376-1385.
Score: 0.008
-
Rate of insufficient samples for fine-needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: The Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group 5 Study. The RDOG5 investigators. Cancer. 1998 Feb 15; 82(4):679-88.
Score: 0.008
-
Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogram. Cancer Detect Prev. 1998; 22(2):161-7.
Score: 0.008
-
The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting. J Digit Imaging. 1997 Nov; 10(4):174-82.
Score: 0.008
-
Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms? J Digit Imaging. 1997 May; 10(2):79-84.
Score: 0.008
-
MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 07; 46(1):290-302.
Score: 0.007
-
Ultrasound and MR findings in acute Budd-Chiari syndrome with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996 Sep-Oct; 20(5):819-22.
Score: 0.007
-
Men (and Women) in Academic Radiology: How Can We Reduce the Gender Discrepancy? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Apr; 206(4):678-80.
Score: 0.007
-
Virtual environments technology to aid needle biopsies of the breast. An example of real-time data fusion. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996; 29:60-1.
Score: 0.007
-
Patient compliance in mobile screening mammography. Acad Radiol. 1995 Dec; 2(12):1067-72.
Score: 0.007
-
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL. Radiology. 2016 Apr; 279(1):44-55.
Score: 0.007
-
New modalities in breast imaging: digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995 Jul; 35(1):31-8.
Score: 0.007
-
Breast imaging fellowship programs. A survey of the fellows of the Society of Breast Imaging. Invest Radiol. 1994 Apr; 29(4):415-9.
Score: 0.006
-
A formal curriculum in breast imaging for radiology residents. Invest Radiol. 1993 Aug; 28(8):762-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Assessing the role of ultrasound in predicting the biological behavior of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb; 200(2):284-90.
Score: 0.006
-
Improving diversity through strategic planning: a 10-year (2002-2012) experience at theMedical University of South Carolina. Acad Med. 2012 Nov; 87(11):1548-55.
Score: 0.006
-
Automated delineation of calcified vessels in mammography by tracking with uncertainty and graphical linking techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Nov; 31(11):2143-55.
Score: 0.005
-
Locally advanced breast cancer: MR imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy--results from ACRIN 6657/I-SPY TRIAL. Radiology. 2012 Jun; 263(3):663-72.
Score: 0.005
-
Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA. 2012 Apr 04; 307(13):1394-404.
Score: 0.005
-
The politics of mammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan; 30(1):235-41.
Score: 0.005
-
Comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MRI in the contralateral breast of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan; 198(1):219-32.
Score: 0.005
-
Annual screening strategies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers: a comparative effectiveness analysis. Cancer. 2012 Apr 15; 118(8):2021-30.
Score: 0.005
-
Implementation of breast cancer screening. Curr Opin Radiol. 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87.
Score: 0.005
-
Breast cancer: comparative effectiveness of positron emission mammography and MR imaging in presurgical planning for the ipsilateral breast. Radiology. 2011 Jan; 258(1):59-72.
Score: 0.005
-
Dietary vitamin D and calcium intake and mammographic density in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2010 Nov-Dec; 17(6):1152-60.
Score: 0.005
-
Strategies for more effective delivery of mammography screening services. Curr Opin Radiol. 1990 Oct; 2(5):726-33.
Score: 0.005
-
Issues in mammography. Cancer. 1990 Sep 15; 66(6 Suppl):1341-4.
Score: 0.005
-
Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51.
Score: 0.005
-
Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9.
Score: 0.005
-
Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: ACRIN 6666. Radiology. 2010 Jan; 254(1):79-87.
Score: 0.005
-
Recommendations for research priorities in breast cancer by the coalition of cancer cooperative groups scientific leadership council: imaging and local therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Apr; 120(2):273-84.
Score: 0.005
-
Conjugated equine estrogen influence on mammographic density in postmenopausal women in a substudy of the women's health initiative randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20; 27(36):6135-43.
Score: 0.004
-
Preoperative localization of inferior breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Aug; 153(2):272.
Score: 0.004
-
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2009 Apr; 251(1):41-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Detection of arterial calcification in mammograms by random walks. Inf Process Med Imaging. 2009; 21:713-24.
Score: 0.004
-
A limitation of ACRIN DMIST. Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):702; author reply 702-3.
Score: 0.004
-
DMIST results: technologic or observer variability? Radiology. 2008 Aug; 248(2):703; author reply 703.
Score: 0.004
-
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14; 299(18):2151-63.
Score: 0.004
-
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study. Radiology. 2008 Apr; 247(1):38-48.
Score: 0.004
-
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 01; 148(1):1-10.
Score: 0.004
-
Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology. 2007 Aug; 244(2):381-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91.
Score: 0.004
-
MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 29; 356(13):1295-303.
Score: 0.004
-
American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr; 57(2):75-89.
Score: 0.004
-
Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26.
Score: 0.004
-
Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
Score: 0.004
-
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
Score: 0.004
-
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jul; 187(1):47-50.
Score: 0.004
-
Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up. Acad Radiol. 2006 May; 13(5):621-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Computation of mass-density images from x-ray refraction-angle images. Phys Med Biol. 2006 Apr 07; 51(7):1769-78.
Score: 0.003
-
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology. 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53.
Score: 0.003
-
Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct 01; 92(1):9-15; discussion 15-6.
Score: 0.003
-
MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883. J Surg Oncol. 2005 Oct 01; 92(1):32-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Sep 21; 97(18):1366-76.
Score: 0.003
-
A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast masses. Eur J Radiol. 2005 Jun; 54(3):365-70.
Score: 0.003
-
Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network. Radiology. 2005 Jun; 235(3):741-51.
Score: 0.003
-
Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2005 May 01; 103(9):1898-905.
Score: 0.003
-
Low-dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary study. Clin Imaging. 2005 May-Jun; 29(3):172-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 10; 23(8):1674-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004 Dec 08; 292(22):2735-42.
Score: 0.003
-
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population. Acad Radiol. 2004 Aug; 11(8):879-86.
Score: 0.003
-
Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308.
Score: 0.003
-
Diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of image-guided breast core needle biopsies: results from a randomized clinical trial. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Jan; 28(1):126-31.
Score: 0.003
-
Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects? Acad Radiol. 2003 Nov; 10(11):1257-66.
Score: 0.003
-
Cortisol levels and responses to mammography screening in breast cancer survivors: a pilot study. Psychosom Med. 2003 Sep-Oct; 65(5):842-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2003 May; 22(5):491-7; quiz 498-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Prevention and early detection clinical trials: opportunities for primary care providers and their patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Mar-Apr; 53(2):82-101.
Score: 0.003
-
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion type. Radiology. 2003 Jan; 226(1):153-60.
Score: 0.003
-
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens. Acad Radiol. 2002 Dec; 9(12):1378-82.
Score: 0.003
-
Should FDG PET be used to decide whether a patient with an abnormal mammogram or breast finding at physical examination should undergo biopsy? Acad Radiol. 2002 Jul; 9(7):773-83.
Score: 0.003
-
Communicating results of diagnostic mammography: what do patients think? Acad Radiol. 2000 Dec; 7(12):1069-76.
Score: 0.002
-
First human experience with pulmonary vein isolation using a through-the-balloon circumferential ultrasound ablation system for recurrent atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2000 Oct 17; 102(16):1879-82.
Score: 0.002
-
Informing patients of diagnostic mammography results: mammographer's opinions. Acad Radiol. 2000 May; 7(5):335-40.
Score: 0.002
-
Paget disease of the breast: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 1998 Nov-Dec; 18(6):1459-64.
Score: 0.002
-
A program to control breast and cervical cancer in North Carolina. N C Med J. 1998 Mar-Apr; 59(2):110-4.
Score: 0.002
-
Future directions in imaging of breast diseases. Radiology. 1998 Feb; 206(2):297-300.
Score: 0.002
-
A pilot study of eye movement during mammography interpretation: eyetracker results and workstation design implications. J Digit Imaging. 1997 Feb; 10(1):14-20.
Score: 0.002
-
Mammographic phantom studies with synchrotron radiation. Radiology. 1996 Sep; 200(3):659-63.
Score: 0.002
-
Safety of nurse-administered deep sedation for defibrillator implantation in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996 Apr; 7(4):301-6.
Score: 0.002
-
Cholelithoptysis: an unusual complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clin Imaging. 1995 Apr-Jun; 19(2):118-21.
Score: 0.002
-
Late occlusion of aortofemoral bypass graft: surgical treatment. Cardiovasc Surg. 1994 Dec; 2(6):763-6.
Score: 0.002
-
A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities. J Digit Imaging. 1994 Nov; 7(4):161-71.
Score: 0.002
-
Effects of delayed processing on mammographic phantom object detection. Invest Radiol. 1993 Dec; 28(12):1113-9.
Score: 0.001
-
Cerebral SPECT with 99mTc-HMPAO in extracranial carotid pathology: evaluation of changes in the ischemic area after carotid endarterectomy. Int Angiol. 1992 Apr-Jun; 11(2):117-21.
Score: 0.001
-
Carotid endarterectomy in young adults. Int Angiol. 1991 Oct-Dec; 10(4):220-3.
Score: 0.001