Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Etta Pisano and Dag Pavic.
Connection Strength
1.558
-
Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patients. Acad Radiol. 2007 May; 14(5):553-60.
Score: 0.308
-
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Dec; 3(6):527-41.
Score: 0.261
-
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys. Acad Radiol. 2004 May; 11(5):536-43.
Score: 0.250
-
Ultrasound in the management of breast disease. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Apr; 3(2):156-64.
Score: 0.232
-
Comparison of image acquisition and radiologist interpretation times in a diagnostic mammography center. Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep; 17(9):1168-74.
Score: 0.096
-
Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression model. Radiology. 2009 Aug; 252(2):348-57.
Score: 0.090
-
Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimens. Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov; 16(11):1329-37.
Score: 0.090
-
Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26.
Score: 0.074
-
A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int J Med Inform. 2006 Oct-Nov; 75(10-11):722-9.
Score: 0.070
-
Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomas. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1211-8.
Score: 0.018
-
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population. Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35.
Score: 0.018
-
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms. Med Phys. 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50.
Score: 0.017
-
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance. Acad Radiol. 2005 May; 12(5):585-95.
Score: 0.017
-
Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 10; 23(8):1674-7.
Score: 0.017