Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Leonard Egede and Edith Williams.
Connection Strength

2.408
  1. Peer-to-Peer Mentoring for African American Women With Lupus: A Feasibility Pilot. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 06; 70(6):908-917.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.633
  2. The impact of arthritis and joint pain on individual healthcare expenditures: findings from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 2011. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 02 28; 19(1):38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.585
  3. The Effect of Travel Burden on Depression and Anxiety in African American Women Living with Systemic Lupus. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 05; 9(11).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  4. Support Methodologies for African American Women With Lupus - Comparing Three Methods' Effects on Patient Activation and Coping. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:734390.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.201
  5. Peer approaches to self-management (PALS): comparing a peer mentoring approach for disease self-management in African American women with lupus with a social support control: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Aug 23; 20(1):529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  6. My life with lupus: contextual responses of African-American women with systemic lupus participating in a peer mentoring intervention to improve disease self-management. BMJ Open. 2018 11 08; 8(11):e022701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  7. Research Ethics in Behavioral Interventions Among Special Populations: Lessons From the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management Study. Am J Med Sci. 2018 02; 355(2):104-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  8. Cytokine balance and behavioral intervention; findings from the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-Management (PALS) project. Hum Immunol. 2017 Sep; 78(9):574-581.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  9. Effective Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Lupus: Potential Impact of Peer Mentoring. Am J Med Sci. 2017 06; 353(6):580-592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.