Connection

Michael Gold to Cardiac Pacing, Artificial

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Cardiac Pacing, Artificial.
Connection Strength

9.261
  1. Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec; 23(12):1317-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  2. Acute performance of a right ventricular automatic pacing threshold algorithm for implantable defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar; 35(3):259-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  3. Prospective comparison of discrimination algorithms to prevent inappropriate ICD therapy: primary results of the Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Mar; 9(3):370-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.345
  4. Economic implications and cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Fail Clin. 2011 Apr; 7(2):241-50, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  5. To the Editor: Optimizing right ventricular lead position for defibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Dec; 9(12):e26-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.329
  6. Response to Coceani: Has CRT earned a class I recommendation? Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Jul; 3(4):559-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  7. Randomized comparison of defibrillation thresholds from the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov; 7(11):1561-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.315
  8. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrial pacing with cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug; 20(8):894-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  9. Role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Mar; 6(1):44-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  10. Use of traditional and biventricular implantable cardiac devices for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death. Cardiol Clin. 2008 Aug; 26(3):419-31, vi-vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.277
  11. A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 May; 18(5):490-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  12. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the role of overdrive and triggered prevention pacing therapies in reducing atrial fibrillation: the Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction (SAFARI). Am Heart J. 2006 Aug; 152(2):231-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.241
  13. Myocardial contractile reserve as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr; 3(4):414-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  14. Comparison of stimulation sites within left ventricular veins on the acute hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Apr; 2(4):376-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  15. Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Apr; 2(4):388-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.220
  16. Iatrogenic ventricular dyssynchrony: a preventable cause of heart failure with right ventricular pacing? Heart Rhythm. 2005 Mar; 2(3):252-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  17. Electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics of patients referred for cardiac transplantation: implications for pacing in heart failure. Clin Cardiol. 2004 Mar; 27(3):151-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  18. Distal right ventricular coil position reduces defibrillation thresholds. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Oct; 14(10):1036-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.198
  19. Contrast-enhanced image-guided lead deployment for left bundle branch pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2021 08; 18(8):1318-1325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  20. Relationship of paced left bundle branch pacing morphology with anatomic location and physiological outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2021 06; 18(6):946-953.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  21. Clinical predictors and efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the importance of the patient's sex. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Jan; 24(1):70-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.164
  22. Permanent His Bundle Pacing Implantation Facilitated by Visualization of the Tricuspid Valve Annulus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 10; 13(10):e008370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  23. Bilateral Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Achieve Physiological Conduction System Activation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 08; 13(8):e008267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  24. Active-Fixation Atrial Leads and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From ASSERT. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 09; 13(9):e008655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  25. Acute hemodynamic effects of right ventricular pacing site and pacing mode in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to either ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2000 May 01; 85(9):1106-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  26. Pacing for patients with congestive heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Clin. 2000 Feb; 18(1):55-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  27. Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1758-1765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  28. Optimization of ventricular pacing: where should we implant the leads? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Feb; 33(2):324-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  29. Overdrive atrial pacing for conversion of atrial flutter: comparison of postoperative with nonpostoperative patients. Am Heart J. 1999 Jan; 137(1):100-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  30. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the?Evaluation and Management of?Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac?Conduction Delay: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 08 20; 74(7):e51-e156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  31. Permanent pacing from the coronary sinus in a patient with an implantable defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2286-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  32. The acute hemodynamic effects of right ventricular septal pacing in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Mar 01; 79(5):679-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  33. Electrophysiologic effects and predictors of success of combination therapy with class Ia and Ib antiarrhythmic drugs for sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jul 01; 78(1):47-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  34. Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct; 26(4):967-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  35. Overdrive pacing for atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15; 74(10):1021-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  36. Who should receive the subcutaneous implanted defibrillator?: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered in all ICD patients who do not require pacing. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec; 6(6):1236-44; discussion 1244-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  37. Ethnic differences in atrial fibrillation identified using implanted cardiac devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr; 24(4):381-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  38. Atrial overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation: insights from ASSERT. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Oct; 9(10):1667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  39. Relevance of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation: results of the Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial mechanisms of atrial fibrillation study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 01; 5(4):626-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  40. Acute clinical evaluation of a left ventricular automatic threshold determination algorithm based on evoked response sensing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar; 35(3):348-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  41. Cardiac resynchronization induces major structural and functional reverse remodeling in patients with New York Heart Association class I/II heart failure. Circulation. 2009 Nov 10; 120(19):1858-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  42. SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison of AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV): rationale and design. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Jan; 33(1):54-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  43. Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10; 54(20):1837-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  44. Implantable device use in systolic heart failure: lessons learned from IMPROVE HF. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Dec; 6(12):1735-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  45. Impact of atrial prevention pacing on atrial fibrillation burden: primary results of the Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction (SAFARI) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Mar; 6(3):295-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  46. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 02; 52(23):1834-1843.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  47. Baseline characteristics of patients randomized in The Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling In Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Congest Heart Fail. 2008 Mar-Apr; 14(2):66-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  48. Atrial overdrive pacing and incidence of heart failure-related adverse events in permanently paced patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun; 19(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  49. Pacing Evaluation-Atrial SUpport Study in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (PEGASUS CRT): design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2007 Jan; 153(1):7-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  50. ASymptomatic atrial fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in pacemaker patients and the atrial fibrillation Reduction atrial pacing Trial (ASSERT). Am Heart J. 2006 Sep; 152(3):442-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  51. Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction with previous symptoms or mild heart failure--the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Am Heart J. 2006 Feb; 151(2):288-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  52. Effectiveness of rapid atrial pacing for termination of drug refractory atrial fibrillation: results of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator trial. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec; 7(4):341-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  53. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Nov; 14(11):1180-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  54. A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20; 42(4):627-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  55. Effects of selective autonomic blockade on T-wave alternans in humans. Circulation. 2002 Feb 19; 105(7):837-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  56. Clinical experience with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Nov; 12(11):1247-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  57. Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 03 16; 10(6):e018127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  58. Comparison of Left Bundle Branch and His Bundle Pacing in Bradycardia Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 10; 6(10):1291-1299.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  59. Atrial defibrillation with a transvenous lead: a randomized comparison of active can shocking pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug; 34(2):358-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  60. Immediate and persistent complete heart block following a horse kick. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 May; 22(5):816-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  61. Prediction of sustained ventricular tachycardia inducible by programmed stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease. Utility of clinical variables. Circulation. 1999 Apr 13; 99(14):1843-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  62. Effect of heart rate on T wave alternans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1998 Jul; 9(7):703-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  63. Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 07; 19(7):950-957.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  64. Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997 May; 8(5):496-501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  65. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrio-biventricular pacing in humans. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Feb; 59(2):294-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  66. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12; 366(2):120-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  67. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation. 2001 Apr 24; 103(16):2066-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  68. Electrophysiologic testing to identify patients with coronary artery disease who are at risk for sudden death. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 29; 342(26):1937-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.