Connection

Michael Gold to Treatment Outcome

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Treatment Outcome.
Connection Strength

4.438
  1. Association of left ventricular remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2023 02; 20(2):173-180.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  2. Association of interventricular activation delay with clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2023 Mar; 20(3):385-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  3. Infection in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Results of the S-ICD Post Approval Study. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Dec; 19(12):1993-2001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  4. Role of Electrical Delay in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2022 06; 14(2):233-241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  5. CRT Efficacy in "Mid-Range" QRS Duration Among Asians Contrasted to Non-Asians, and Influence of Height. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 02; 8(2):211-221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  6. The cost of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characterizing heart failure events following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace. 2021 10 09; 23(10):1586-1595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  7. Same-day discharge after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation in a large nationwide administrative claims database. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 09; 32(9):2432-2440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  8. Impact of age on catheter ablation of premature ventricular contractions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 04; 32(4):1077-1084.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  9. Redefining the Classifications of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the REVERSE Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 07; 7(7):871-880.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  10. Predicting complete heart block after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using a risk stratification model and clinical tool. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 08 01; 98(2):393-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  11. Primary Results From the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (UNTOUCHED) Trial. Circulation. 2021 01 05; 143(1):7-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  12. 1-Year Prospective Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Shocks: The?Subcutaneous?ICD?Post?Approval Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 11; 6(12):1537-1550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  13. The role of electrophysiologic study in high-risk patients with new-onset conduction disturbances following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 09; 31(9):2522-2525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  14. Outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in dialysis patients: Results from the S-ICD post-approval study. Heart Rhythm. 2020 09; 17(9):1566-1574.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  15. Electromagnetic interference from left ventricular assist devices in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 05; 31(5):1195-1201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  16. Comparison of measures of ventricular delay on cardiac resynchronization therapy response. Heart Rhythm. 2020 04; 17(4):615-620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  17. The effect of posture, exercise, and atrial pacing on atrioventricular conduction in systolic heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 12; 30(12):2892-2899.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  18. Effect of Interventricular Electrical Delay on Atrioventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 08; 11(8):e006055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  19. Use of antibiotic envelopes to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infections: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 04; 29(4):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  20. Treatment of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: Does One Plus One Always Equal Two? Circulation. 2018 01 16; 137(3):217-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  21. The role of interventricular conduction delay to predict clinical response with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2017 12; 14(12):1748-1755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  22. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator Post-Approval Study: Clinical characteristics and perioperative results. Heart Rhythm. 2017 10; 14(10):1456-1463.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  23. The Design of the Understanding Outcomes with the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients with Low EF Study (UNTOUCHED). Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan; 40(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  24. The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Heart Fail Clin. 2017 Jan; 13(1):209-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  25. Beta-blocker therapy for long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: Are all beta-blockers equivalent? Heart Rhythm. 2017 01; 14(1):e41-e44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  26. The Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on Mortality with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Aug; 39(8):863-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  27. Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Heart Failure: The INOVATE-HF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 07 12; 68(2):149-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  28. Safety and Efficacy of the Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 02; 67(4):445-454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  29. The Role of Atrioventricular and Interventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Dec; 7(4):765-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  30. Long-Term Extrapolation of Clinical Benefits Among Patients With Mild Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Analysis of the 5-Year Follow-Up From the REVERSE Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Sep; 3(9):691-700.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  31. Clinical experience with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Jul; 12(7):398-405.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  32. A new algorithm to reduce inappropriate therapy in the S-ICD system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr; 26(4):417-423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  33. The effect of reverse remodeling on long-term survival in mildly symptomatic patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the REVERSE study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar; 12(3):524-530.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  34. Use of a discrimination algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug; 11(8):1352-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  35. The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on the acute hemodynamic response with cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Jun; 25(6):624-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  36. Davunetide: a review of safety and efficacy data with a focus on neurodegenerative diseases. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep; 6(5):483-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  37. Plasma profiles of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of the metalloproteinases predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cardioversion. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013 Aug; 6(4):528-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  38. The effect of left ventricular electrical delay on AV optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jul; 10(7):988-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  39. Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar; 24(3):323-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  40. Atrial support pacing in heart failure: results from the multicenter PEGASUS CRT trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Dec; 23(12):1317-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  41. Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circulation. 2012 Aug 14; 126(7):822-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  42. Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: importance of programmed parameters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan; 23(1):110-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  43. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct; 32(20):2516-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  44. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011 Aug; 13(4):134-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  45. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for mild heart failure: the time has come. Circulation. 2011 Jan 18; 123(2):195-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  46. The impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in mild heart failure. Heart Rhythm. 2011 May; 8(5):679-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  47. Defibrillation thresholds in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 May; 22(5):569-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  48. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: a review of the REVERSE and MADIT-CRT trials. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010 Sep; 12(5):367-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  49. Rosiglitazone monotherapy in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010; 30(2):131-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  50. Role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Mar; 6(1):44-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  51. The effect of dofetilide on ventricular defibrillation thresholds. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan; 32(1):24-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  52. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for primary prevention of sudden death after alcohol septal ablation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 18; 52(21):1718-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  53. Atrial overdrive pacing and incidence of heart failure-related adverse events in permanently paced patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun; 19(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  54. A prospective comparison of AV delay programming methods for hemodynamic optimization during cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 May; 18(5):490-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  55. Optimization of atrial defibrillation with a dual-coil, active pectoral lead system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Jul; 15(7):790-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  56. Enhanced detection of arrhythmia vulnerability using T wave alternans, left ventricular ejection fraction, and programmed ventricular stimulation: a prospective study in subjects with chronic ischemic heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Feb; 15(2):170-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  57. Effectiveness of rapid atrial pacing for termination of drug refractory atrial fibrillation: results of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator trial. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec; 7(4):341-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  58. Distal right ventricular coil position reduces defibrillation thresholds. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Oct; 14(10):1036-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  59. Treatment of pancreatic pseudoaneurysm with percutaneous transabdominal thrombin injection. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Sep; 38(3):600-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  60. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Improves Outcomes in Patients With Intraventricular Conduction Delay But Not Right Bundle Branch Block: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circulation. 2023 Mar 07; 147(10):812-823.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  61. Long-term outcomes in nonprogressors to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2023 02; 20(2):165-170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  62. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 09 27; 80(13):1205-1216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  63. Epicardial mapping and ablation of ventricular tachycardia from the coronary venous system in post-coronary bypass patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan; 66(1):145-151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  64. Clinical predictors of defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral pulse generator lead system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Apr; 25(4 Pt 1):408-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  65. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  66. The importance of early evaluation after cardiac resynchronization therapy to redefine response: Pooled individual patient analysis from 5 prospective studies. Heart Rhythm. 2022 04; 19(4):595-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  67. Clinical experience with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Nov; 12(11):1247-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  68. Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 03 16; 10(6):e018127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  69. Modified design of stimulation of the left ventricular endocardium for cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonresponders, previously untreatable and high-risk upgrade patients (SOLVE-CRT) trial. Am Heart J. 2021 05; 235:158-162.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  70. Outcomes of two versus three incision techniques: Results from the subcutaneous ICD post-approval study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 03; 32(3):792-801.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  71. Clinical predictors and efficacy of antitachycardia pacing in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the importance of the patient's sex. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Jan; 24(1):70-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  72. Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: lessons learned from MADIT and MUSTT. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1981-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  73. Effect of second-phase duration on the strength-duration relation for human transvenous defibrillation. Circulation. 2000 Oct 31; 102(18):2239-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  74. Economic implications of adding a novel algorithm to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of economic analysis for the AdaptResponse trial. J Med Econ. 2020 Dec; 23(12):1401-1408.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  75. Healthcare utilization and cost in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure undergoing catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 12; 31(12):3166-3175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  76. IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 10 01; 19(10):985-991.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  77. Permanent His Bundle Pacing Implantation Facilitated by Visualization of the Tricuspid Valve Annulus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 10; 13(10):e008370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  78. Differences in clinical characteristics and reported quality of life of men and women undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. ESC Heart Fail. 2020 10; 7(5):2972-2982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  79. Bilateral Bundle Branch Area Pacing to Achieve Physiological Conduction System Activation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 08; 13(8):e008267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  80. Active-Fixation Atrial Leads and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From ASSERT. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 09; 13(9):e008655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  81. ICD therapy in the new millennium. Cardiol Clin. 2000 May; 18(2):375-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  82. Intracardiac echocardiography use and outcomes after catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia. J Comp Eff Res. 2020 04; 9(5):375-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  83. Pacing for patients with congestive heart failure and dilated cardiomyopathy. Cardiol Clin. 2000 Feb; 18(1):55-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  84. Real-world outcomes of ventricular tachycardia catheter ablation with versus without intracardiac echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 02; 31(2):417-422.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  85. A multicentre, phase IIa study of zolbetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent or refractory advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or lower oesophagus: the MONO study. Ann Oncol. 2019 09 01; 30(9):1487-1495.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  86. Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1758-1765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  87. Overdrive atrial pacing for conversion of atrial flutter: comparison of postoperative with nonpostoperative patients. Am Heart J. 1999 Jan; 137(1):100-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  88. The effect of shock configuration and delivered energy on defibrillation impedance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 2):165-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  89. Noninvasive tissue adhesive for cardiac implantable electronic device pocket closure: the TAPE pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar; 54(2):171-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  90. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Sep; 2(3):273-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  91. Comparison of Hyaluronic Acid Gel With (HARDL) and Without Lidocaine (HAJUP) in the Treatment of Moderate-To-Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded Study. Dermatol Surg. 2018 06; 44(6):833-840.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  92. The interaction of sex, height, and QRS duration on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality: an individual-patient data meta-analysis. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 04; 20(4):780-791.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  93. Comparison of power- and temperature-guided radiofrequency modification of the atrioventricular node. Polaris Investigator Group. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Dec 01; 80(11):1444-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  94. Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation. Circulation. 1997 Nov 18; 96(10):3517-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  95. Precision Medicine for Cardiac Resynchronization: Predicting Quality of Life Benefits for Individual Patients-An Analysis From 5 Clinical Trials. Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct; 10(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  96. Subcutaneous Versus Transvenous Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 12 26; 3(13):1475-1483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  97. Comparison of class Ia/Ib versus class III antiarrhythmic drugs for the suppression of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Sep 01; 80(5):591-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  98. Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 07; 19(7):950-957.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  99. Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur Heart J. 2017 May 01; 38(17):1339-1344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  100. Predictors of short-term clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 08; 19(8):1056-1063.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  101. Left Ventricular Architecture, Long-Term Reverse Remodeling, and Clinical Outcome in Mild Heart Failure With Cardiac?Resynchronization: Results From the REVERSE Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 03; 5(3):169-178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  102. Longer Left Ventricular Electric Delay Reduces Mitral Regurgitation After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Mechanistic Insights From the SMART-AV Study (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 11; 9(11).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  103. Prospective Internally Controlled Blind Reviewed Clinical Evaluation of Cryolipolysis Combined With Multipolar Radiofrequency andVaripulseTechnology for Enhanced Subject Results in Circumferential Fat Reduction and Skin Laxity of the Flanks. J Drugs Dermatol. 2016 Nov 01; 15(11):1354-1358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  104. Efficacy and safety of procainamide in preventing arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 01; 78(9):975-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  105. Image Quality of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator System Designed for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 May; 9(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  106. Evaluation of subcutaneous ICD early performance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the pooled EFFORTLESS and IDE cohorts. Heart Rhythm. 2016 05; 13(5):1066-1074.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  107. Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Cardiac Remodeling and Contractile Function: Results From Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 11; 4(9):e002054.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  108. Novel measure of electrical dyssynchrony predicts response in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results from the SMART-AV Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Dec; 12(12):2402-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  109. Safety and Efficacy of the Totally Subcutaneous Implantable Defibrillator: 2-Year Results From a Pooled Analysis of the IDE?Study?and?EFFORTLESS Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 28; 65(16):1605-1615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  110. The Post-Myocardial Infarction Pacing Remodeling Prevention Therapy (PRomPT) Trial: Design and Rationale. J Card Fail. 2015 Jul; 21(7):601-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  111. Overdrive pacing for atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol. 1994 Nov 15; 74(10):1021-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  112. Clinical epidemiology and predictors of outcome in children hospitalised with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in 2009: a prospective national study. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2014 Nov; 8(6):636-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  113. HRS/ACC/AHA expert consensus statement on the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients who are not included or not well represented in clinical trials. Circulation. 2014 Jul 01; 130(1):94-125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  114. Long-term effectiveness of the combined minute ventilation and patient activity sensors as predictor of heart failure events in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results of the Clinical Evaluation of the Physiological Diagnosis Function in the PARADYM CRT device Trial (CLEPSYDRA) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 16(6):663-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  115. Safety and efficacy of a totally subcutaneous implantable-cardioverter defibrillator. Circulation. 2013 Aug 27; 128(9):944-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  116. An individual patient meta-analysis of five randomized trials assessing the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on morbidity and mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2013 Dec; 34(46):3547-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  117. A phase IV, open-label study evaluating the use of triple-combination therapy with minocycline HCl extended-release tablets, a topical antibiotic/retinoid preparation and benzoyl peroxide in patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Jun 01; 12(6):619-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  118. 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. Europace. 2012 Sep; 14(9):1236-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  119. 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Sep; 9(9):1524-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  120. Atrial overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation: insights from ASSERT. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Oct; 9(10):1667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  121. Relevance of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation: results of the Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial mechanisms of atrial fibrillation study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 01; 5(4):626-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  122. Rationale and study design of the increase of vagal tone in heart failure study: INOVATE-HF. Am Heart J. 2012 Jun; 163(6):954-962.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  123. Sites of left and right ventricular lead implantation and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy observations from the REVERSE trial. Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov; 33(21):2662-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  124. Potential mechanisms underlying the effect of gender on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from the SMART-AV multicenter trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012 May; 9(5):736-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  125. Continuous hemodynamic monitoring in patients with mild to moderate heart failure: results of The Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (REDUCEhf) trial. Congest Heart Fail. 2011 Sep-Oct; 17(5):248-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  126. Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT). Circulation. 2011 Mar 15; 123(10):1061-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  127. Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography-guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21; 122(25):2660-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  128. Do Beta-blockers impact microvolt T-wave alternans testing in patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias? A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep; 21(9):1009-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  129. A multi-center randomized proof-of-concept clinical trial applying [?8F]FDG-PET for evaluation of metabolic therapy with rosiglitazone XR in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010; 22(4):1241-56.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  130. Cardiac resynchronization induces major structural and functional reverse remodeling in patients with New York Heart Association class I/II heart failure. Circulation. 2009 Nov 10; 120(19):1858-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  131. Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10; 54(20):1837-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  132. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 02; 52(23):1834-1843.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  133. Serial evaluation of atrial tachyarrhythmia burden and frequency after implantation of a dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Jul; 16(7):708-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  134. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Nov; 14(11):1180-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  135. A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20; 42(4):627-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  136. Prevalence of sensing abnormalities in dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2003 Jul; 8(3):219-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  137. Effect of implantable defibrillators on arrhythmic events and mortality in the multicenter unsustained tachycardia trial. Circulation. 2002 Jul 09; 106(2):233-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  138. Performance of a new steroid-eluting coronary sinus lead designed for left ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1741-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  139. Gender differences in presentation, management, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Nov 01; 80(9):1183-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  140. Intranasal fluticasone propionate versus loratadine in the treatment of adolescent patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Feb; 97(2):588-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.