Michael Gold to Algorithms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Algorithms.
Connection Strength
2.744
-
A new algorithm to reduce inappropriate therapy in the S-ICD system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr; 26(4):417-423.
Score: 0.315
-
Use of a discrimination algorithm to reduce inappropriate shocks with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2014 Aug; 11(8):1352-8.
Score: 0.297
-
Food allergy testing in infantile eczema: a clinical approach and algorithm. Australas J Dermatol. 2013 May; 54(2):79-84.
Score: 0.262
-
Acute performance of a right ventricular automatic pacing threshold algorithm for implantable defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar; 35(3):259-68.
Score: 0.253
-
Head-to-head comparison of arrhythmia discrimination performance of subcutaneous and transvenous ICD arrhythmia detection algorithms: the START study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr; 23(4):359-66.
Score: 0.251
-
The Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial (RIGHT): design of a randomized trial comparing competitive rhythm discrimination algorithms in implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Jul; 17(7):749-53.
Score: 0.173
-
Comparison of step-down and binary search algorithms for determination of defibrillation threshold in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004 Feb; 27(2):218-20.
Score: 0.147
-
A new algorithm for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation based on body weight. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Nov 01; 88(9):1043-5.
Score: 0.125
-
A new defibrillator discrimination algorithm utilizing electrogram morphology analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Jan; 22(1 Pt 2):179-82.
Score: 0.103
-
The rationale and design of the SMART CRT trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 09; 41(9):1212-1216.
Score: 0.100
-
Comparison of fixed tilt and tuned defibrillation waveforms: the PROMISE study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Mar; 24(3):323-7.
Score: 0.068
-
Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: importance of programmed parameters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Jan; 23(1):110-8.
Score: 0.063
-
Acute clinical evaluation of a left ventricular automatic threshold determination algorithm based on evoked response sensing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar; 35(3):348-56.
Score: 0.063
-
Prospective comparison of discrimination algorithms to prevent inappropriate ICD therapy: primary results of the Rhythm ID Going Head to Head Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Mar; 9(3):370-7.
Score: 0.062
-
Assessment of a novel device-based diagnostic algorithm to monitor patient status in moderate-to-severe heart failure: rationale and design of the CLEPSYDRA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Dec; 12(12):1363-71.
Score: 0.058
-
Atrial overdrive pacing and incidence of heart failure-related adverse events in permanently paced patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun; 19(1):55-60.
Score: 0.046
-
Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Apr; 2(4):388-94.
Score: 0.040
-
Effectiveness of rapid atrial pacing for termination of drug refractory atrial fibrillation: results of a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator trial. Card Electrophysiol Rev. 2003 Dec; 7(4):341-4.
Score: 0.036
-
Advanced rhythm discrimination for implantable cardioverter defibrillators using electrogram vector timing and correlation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Nov; 13(11):1092-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Clinical experience with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Nov; 12(11):1247-53.
Score: 0.031
-
Correlation waveform analysis of the atrial signal: the shape of things to come? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Feb; 12(2):150-2.
Score: 0.030
-
Economic implications of adding a novel algorithm to optimize cardiac resynchronization therapy: rationale and design of economic analysis for the AdaptResponse trial. J Med Econ. 2020 Dec; 23(12):1401-1408.
Score: 0.029
-
Comparison of bipolar and integrated sensing for redetection of ventricular fibrillation. Am Heart J. 1999 Jul; 138(1 Pt 1):133-6.
Score: 0.027
-
2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2019 08 20; 140(8):e333-e381.
Score: 0.025
-
Implications and treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1998 Jan; 13(1):20-7.
Score: 0.024
-
Rationale and design of the AdaptResponse trial: a prospective randomized study of cardiac resynchronization therapy with preferential adaptive left ventricular-only pacing. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 07; 19(7):950-957.
Score: 0.023
-
Long-term effectiveness of the combined minute ventilation and patient activity sensors as predictor of heart failure events in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results of the Clinical Evaluation of the Physiological Diagnosis Function in the PARADYM CRT device Trial (CLEPSYDRA) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Jun; 16(6):663-70.
Score: 0.018
-
Atrial overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation: insights from ASSERT. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Oct; 9(10):1667-73.
Score: 0.016
-
Primary results from the SmartDelay determined AV optimization: a comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: a randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography-guided, and algorithmic atrioventricular delay programming in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2010 Dec 21; 122(25):2660-8.
Score: 0.015
-
A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Aug 20; 42(4):627-33.
Score: 0.009