Michael Gold to Ventricular Remodeling
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Ventricular Remodeling.
Connection Strength
4.901
-
Comparison of measures of ventricular delay on cardiac resynchronization therapy response. Heart Rhythm. 2020 04; 17(4):615-620.
Score: 0.534
-
Effect of Interventricular Electrical Delay on Atrioventricular Optimization for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 08; 11(8):e006055.
Score: 0.488
-
Vagus Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Heart Failure: The INOVATE-HF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 07 12; 68(2):149-58.
Score: 0.415
-
Long-Term Extrapolation of Clinical Benefits Among Patients With Mild Heart Failure Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Analysis of the 5-Year Follow-Up From the REVERSE Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Sep; 3(9):691-700.
Score: 0.397
-
The effect of reverse remodeling on long-term survival in mildly symptomatic patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the REVERSE study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar; 12(3):524-530.
Score: 0.377
-
Implantable defibrillators improve survival in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis of the long-term follow-up of remodeling in systolic left ventricular dysfunction (REVERSE). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Dec; 6(6):1163-8.
Score: 0.350
-
The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct; 32(20):2516-24.
Score: 0.302
-
Temporal stability of defibrillation thresholds with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul; 8(7):1008-13.
Score: 0.291
-
Role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Mar; 6(1):44-8.
Score: 0.254
-
Association of left ventricular remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2023 02; 20(2):173-180.
Score: 0.165
-
Redefining the Classifications of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the REVERSE Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 07; 7(7):871-880.
Score: 0.146
-
Left Ventricular Architecture, Long-Term Reverse Remodeling, and Clinical Outcome in Mild Heart Failure With Cardiac?Resynchronization: Results From the REVERSE Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2017 03; 5(3):169-178.
Score: 0.111
-
Longer Left Ventricular Electric Delay Reduces Mitral Regurgitation After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Mechanistic Insights From the SMART-AV Study (SmartDelay Determined AV Optimization: A Comparison to Other AV Delay Methods Used in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 11; 9(11).
Score: 0.108
-
Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Cardiac Remodeling and Contractile Function: Results From Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE). J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 11; 4(9):e002054.
Score: 0.100
-
Biventricular pacemaker/defibrillators versus biventricular pacemakers in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep; 7(3):455-9.
Score: 0.098
-
The Post-Myocardial Infarction Pacing Remodeling Prevention Therapy (PRomPT) Trial: Design and Rationale. J Card Fail. 2015 Jul; 21(7):601-7.
Score: 0.097
-
Impact of ejection fraction on the clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Nov; 6(6):1180-9.
Score: 0.087
-
Long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure: 5-year results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Eur Heart J. 2013 Sep; 34(33):2592-9.
Score: 0.085
-
Chronic kidney disease and cardiac remodelling in patients with mild heart failure: results from the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic Left vEntricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Dec; 14(12):1420-8.
Score: 0.081
-
Effect of QRS duration and morphology on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in mild heart failure: results from the Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Circulation. 2012 Aug 14; 126(7):822-9.
Score: 0.080
-
Potential mechanisms underlying the effect of gender on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from the SMART-AV multicenter trial. Heart Rhythm. 2012 May; 9(5):736-41.
Score: 0.077
-
Cardiac resynchronization induces major structural and functional reverse remodeling in patients with New York Heart Association class I/II heart failure. Circulation. 2009 Nov 10; 120(19):1858-65.
Score: 0.066
-
Baseline characteristics of patients randomized in The Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling In Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Congest Heart Fail. 2008 Mar-Apr; 14(2):66-74.
Score: 0.059
-
Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction with previous symptoms or mild heart failure--the REsynchronization reVErses Remodeling in Systolic left vEntricular dysfunction (REVERSE) study. Am Heart J. 2006 Feb; 151(2):288-94.
Score: 0.051
-
Selective induction of matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases in atrial and ventricular myocardium in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 15; 97(4):532-7.
Score: 0.051
-
Prevention of disease progression by cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction: insights from the European cohort of the REVERSE (Resynchronization Reverses Remodeling in Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Nov 10; 54(20):1837-46.
Score: 0.017
-
Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 02; 52(23):1834-1843.
Score: 0.016