Connection

Michael Gold to Pacemaker, Artificial

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gold has written about Pacemaker, Artificial.
Connection Strength

6.736
  1. Use of antibiotic envelopes to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infections: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 04; 29(4):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.540
  2. Biventricular pacemaker/defibrillators versus biventricular pacemakers in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep; 7(3):455-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  3. Are leadless pacemakers a niche or the future of device therapy? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 21; 65(15):1505-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  4. Preclinical evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator developed for magnetic resonance imaging use. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Mar; 12(3):631-638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.432
  5. Safety of continuous anticoagulation with dabigatran during implantation of cardiac rhythm devices. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Apr 15; 111(8):1165-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  6. Meta-analysis of bleeding complications associated with cardiac rhythm device implantation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun 01; 5(3):468-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  7. Microbiologic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of pacemaker/ICD infections: a moving target! J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012 Apr; 23(4):382-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  8. Role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2009 Mar; 6(1):44-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  9. Impact of atrial prevention pacing on atrial fibrillation burden: primary results of the Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction (SAFARI) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Mar; 6(3):295-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.285
  10. Atrial overdrive pacing and incidence of heart failure-related adverse events in permanently paced patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun; 19(1):55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.258
  11. Iatrogenic ventricular dyssynchrony: a preventable cause of heart failure with right ventricular pacing? Heart Rhythm. 2005 Mar; 2(3):252-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  12. European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for the care and outcomes of cardiac pacing: developed by the Working Group for Cardiac Pacing Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Europace. 2022 01 04; 24(1):165-172.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  13. Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation Before and After Hospitalisation for Noncardiac Surgery or Medical Illness: Insights From ASSERT. Can J Cardiol. 2021 05; 37(5):803-809.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  14. Active-Fixation Atrial Leads and the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From ASSERT. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 09; 13(9):e008655.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  15. Left ventricular endocardial pacing: don't try this at home. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Nov; 22(11):1567-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  16. Optimization of ventricular pacing: where should we implant the leads? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Feb; 33(2):324-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  17. Reversible prolonged pacemaker failure due to electrocautery. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1998 Dec; 2(4):343-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  18. Noninvasive tissue adhesive for cardiac implantable electronic device pocket closure: the TAPE pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019 Mar; 54(2):171-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  19. Progression of Device-Detected Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation and the Risk?of Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 06 12; 71(23):2603-2611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  20. Stroke type and severity in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation: An analysis from the Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial (ASSERT). Am Heart J. 2018 07; 201:160-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  21. Permanent pacing from the coronary sinus in a patient with an implantable defibrillator. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2286-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  22. Duration of device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation and occurrence of stroke in ASSERT. Eur Heart J. 2017 May 01; 38(17):1339-1344.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  23. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Conditional External Cardiac Defibrillator: Expanding Access and Safety During Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 10; 9(10).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  24. Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct; 26(4):967-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  25. Response to letter regarding article "Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events". Circulation. 2015 Feb 03; 131(5):e337-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  26. Temporal relationship between subclinical atrial fibrillation and embolic events. Circulation. 2014 May 27; 129(21):2094-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  27. Ethnic differences in atrial fibrillation identified using implanted cardiac devices. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr; 24(4):381-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  28. Relevance of electrical remodeling in human atrial fibrillation: results of the Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke Evaluation in Pacemaker Patients and the Atrial Fibrillation Reduction Atrial Pacing Trial mechanisms of atrial fibrillation study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug 01; 5(4):626-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  29. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12; 366(2):120-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  30. The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management: executive summary this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Heart Rhythm. 2011 Jul; 8(7):e1-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  31. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial to assess the role of overdrive and triggered prevention pacing therapies in reducing atrial fibrillation: the Study of Atrial Fibrillation Reduction (SAFARI). Am Heart J. 2006 Aug; 152(2):231-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  32. Myocardial contractile reserve as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Apr; 3(4):414-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  33. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Nov; 14(11):1180-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  34. Performance of a new steroid-eluting coronary sinus lead designed for left ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1741-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  35. Permanent His Bundle Pacing Implantation Facilitated by Visualization of the Tricuspid Valve Annulus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 10; 13(10):e008370.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  36. Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics. Heart Rhythm. 2019 12; 16(12):1758-1765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  37. The acute hemodynamic effects of right ventricular septal pacing in patients with congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1997 Mar 01; 79(5):679-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.