Susan Harvey to Breast Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Susan Harvey has written about Breast Neoplasms.
Connection Strength
8.937
-
Outcomes of Foci on Breast MRI: Features Associated With Malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 10; 215(4):1012-1019.
Score: 0.363
-
Improving State-Mandated Breast Density Notifications. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):384-390.
Score: 0.341
-
Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks. J Digit Imaging. 2019 08; 32(4):565-570.
Score: 0.338
-
Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Detection Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Glob Oncol. 2019 08; 5:1-17.
Score: 0.338
-
Improving Patient Comprehension of Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letters. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Dec; 16(12):1669-1676.
Score: 0.335
-
A Pilot of Data-Driven Modeling to Assess Potential for Improved Efficiency in an Academic Breast-Imaging Center. J Digit Imaging. 2019 04; 32(2):221-227.
Score: 0.330
-
The Importance of Understanding Breast Cancer in Pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 06; 28(6):737-738.
Score: 0.329
-
Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2019 11; 26(11):1505-1512.
Score: 0.327
-
Changes in Final BI-RADS Assessment Categories and Clinical Outcome Metrics When Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Included in Diagnostic Mammography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May; 16(5):728-732.
Score: 0.326
-
Variability in Individual Radiologist BI-RADS 3 Usage at a Large Academic Center: What's the Cause and What Should We Do About It? Acad Radiol. 2019 07; 26(7):915-922.
Score: 0.319
-
A Review of Options for Localization of Axillary Lymph Nodes in the Treatment of Invasive Breast Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2019 06; 26(6):805-819.
Score: 0.317
-
Assessment and Improvement Strategies for a Breast Cancer Early Detection Program in Rural South Africa. J Glob Oncol. 2018 07; 4:1-12.
Score: 0.313
-
Strategies for Decreasing Screening Mammography Recall Rates While Maintaining Performance Metrics. Acad Radiol. 2017 12; 24(12):1556-1560.
Score: 0.294
-
Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug; 164(3):719-725.
Score: 0.290
-
An Abbreviated Protocol for High-risk Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Impact on Performance Metrics and BI-RADS Assessment. Acad Radiol. 2017 09; 24(9):1132-1138.
Score: 0.290
-
An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R74-R80.
Score: 0.279
-
Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 08; 158(3):583-9.
Score: 0.274
-
An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Apr; 13(4):374-80.
Score: 0.260
-
Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Sep; 24(9):777-83.
Score: 0.258
-
Metastatic Disease to the Breast From Extramammary Malignancies: A Multimodality Pictorial Review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 May-Jun; 45(3):225-32.
Score: 0.255
-
Does a Picture Make a Difference? Ultrasound Guidance in the Management of the Axilla After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20; 33(30):3367-9.
Score: 0.249
-
Incidental lung cancer found on screening breast MRI with eventual lymphatic metastasis to the breast. Breast Dis. 2015; 35(3):207-10.
Score: 0.246
-
The charge and the challenges of breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1:S1-2.
Score: 0.240
-
Understanding patient options, utilization patterns, and burdens associated with breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1:S3-9.
Score: 0.240
-
The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep; 58(9):942-50.
Score: 0.129
-
Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 May; 180(5):1461-7.
Score: 0.110
-
DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2021 02; 34(1):27-35.
Score: 0.093
-
Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis. J Med Screen. 2021 09; 28(3):311-317.
Score: 0.093
-
Impact of Improved Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letter Readability on Patient Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov; 17(11):1429-1436.
Score: 0.091
-
Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients with T1-2 Tumors and 1-3 Positive Lymph Nodes Treated with or without Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy. Sci Rep. 2020 06 18; 10(1):9887.
Score: 0.090
-
Impact of Telephone Communication on Patient Adherence With Follow-Up Recommendations After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Sep; 17(9):1139-1148.
Score: 0.089
-
Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for a radiological biomarker of breast cancer: Preliminary results. Med Phys. 2020 Jan; 47(1):75-88.
Score: 0.086
-
Breast MRI BI-RADS 3: Impact of Patient-Level Factors on Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):377-383.
Score: 0.086
-
DNA Methylation Markers for Breast Cancer Detection in the Developing World. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 11 01; 25(21):6357-6367.
Score: 0.084
-
Review of axillary web syndrome: What the radiologist should know. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr; 113:66-73.
Score: 0.082
-
Robust Short-Lag Spatial Coherence Imaging of Breast Ultrasound Data: Initial Clinical Results. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019 03; 66(3):527-540.
Score: 0.081
-
Impact of insurance coverage and socioeconomic factors on screening mammography patients' selection of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography. Breast J. 2018 11; 24(6):1091-1093.
Score: 0.080
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2019 May - Jun; 55:188-195.
Score: 0.079
-
Characteristics and Outcomes of BI-RADS 3 Lesions on Breast MRI. Clin Breast Cancer. 2019 02; 19(1):e152-e159.
Score: 0.079
-
Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis? Acad Radiol. 2018 08; 25(8):973-976.
Score: 0.076
-
Adjuvant radiation use in older women with early-stage breast cancer at Johns Hopkins. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 11; 160(2):291-296.
Score: 0.069
-
Impact of Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations at Screening Mammography: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Radiology. 2017 Feb; 282(2):437-448.
Score: 0.069
-
Invasive Breast Cancer Preferably and Predominantly Occurs at the Interface Between Fibroglandular and Adipose Tissue. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 02; 17(1):e11-e18.
Score: 0.069
-
Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening. Breast. 2016 Jun; 27:52-61.
Score: 0.067
-
Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Current Practice, Controversies, and Future Directions. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015 Nov; 29(11):828-38.
Score: 0.065
-
Towards CNN-Based Registration of Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique 2-D X-ray Mammographic Images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul; 2019:2758-2764.
Score: 0.021