Susan Harvey to Mammography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Susan Harvey has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength
7.724
-
Deep-Learning-Based Semantic Labeling for 2D Mammography and Comparison of Complexity for Machine Learning Tasks. J Digit Imaging. 2019 08; 32(4):565-570.
Score: 0.530
-
Improving Patient Comprehension of Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letters. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Dec; 16(12):1669-1676.
Score: 0.525
-
Factors Impacting False Positive Recall in Screening Mammography. Acad Radiol. 2019 11; 26(11):1505-1512.
Score: 0.513
-
Changes in Final BI-RADS Assessment Categories and Clinical Outcome Metrics When Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Is Included in Diagnostic Mammography. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May; 16(5):728-732.
Score: 0.511
-
Impact of insurance coverage and socioeconomic factors on screening mammography patients' selection of digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography. Breast J. 2018 11; 24(6):1091-1093.
Score: 0.499
-
Strategies for Decreasing Screening Mammography Recall Rates While Maintaining Performance Metrics. Acad Radiol. 2017 12; 24(12):1556-1560.
Score: 0.461
-
Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug; 164(3):719-725.
Score: 0.455
-
An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R74-R80.
Score: 0.438
-
Comparative effectiveness of breast MRI and mammography in screening young women with elevated risk of developing breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 08; 158(3):583-9.
Score: 0.430
-
An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Apr; 13(4):374-80.
Score: 0.408
-
Listening to Women: Expectations and Experiences in Breast Imaging. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Sep; 24(9):777-83.
Score: 0.404
-
Metastatic Disease to the Breast From Extramammary Malignancies: A Multimodality Pictorial Review. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2016 May-Jun; 45(3):225-32.
Score: 0.399
-
Understanding patient options, utilization patterns, and burdens associated with breast cancer screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2014 Sep; 23 Suppl 1:S3-9.
Score: 0.377
-
Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 May; 180(5):1461-7.
Score: 0.172
-
DeepCAT: Deep Computer-Aided Triage of Screening Mammography. J Digit Imaging. 2021 02; 34(1):27-35.
Score: 0.146
-
Benefits of digital breast tomosynthesis: A lesion-level analysis. J Med Screen. 2021 09; 28(3):311-317.
Score: 0.146
-
Impact of Improved Screening Mammography Recall Lay Letter Readability on Patient Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov; 17(11):1429-1436.
Score: 0.142
-
Impact of Telephone Communication on Patient Adherence With Follow-Up Recommendations After an Abnormal Screening Mammogram. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Sep; 17(9):1139-1148.
Score: 0.139
-
Improving State-Mandated Breast Density Notifications. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):384-390.
Score: 0.134
-
Towards CNN-Based Registration of Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique 2-D X-ray Mammographic Images. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul; 2019:2758-2764.
Score: 0.132
-
Variability in Individual Radiologist BI-RADS 3 Usage at a Large Academic Center: What's the Cause and What Should We Do About It? Acad Radiol. 2019 07; 26(7):915-922.
Score: 0.125
-
Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts. Clin Imaging. 2019 May - Jun; 55:188-195.
Score: 0.125
-
Synthesized Mammography: The New Standard of Care When Screening for Breast Cancer with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis? Acad Radiol. 2018 08; 25(8):973-976.
Score: 0.119
-
Impact of Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations at Screening Mammography: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Radiology. 2017 Feb; 282(2):437-448.
Score: 0.109
-
Systematic review of 3D mammography for breast cancer screening. Breast. 2016 Jun; 27:52-61.
Score: 0.105
-
Incidental lung cancer found on screening breast MRI with eventual lymphatic metastasis to the breast. Breast Dis. 2015; 35(3):207-10.
Score: 0.096
-
The use of additional imaging increased specificity and decreased sensitivity in screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Sep; 58(9):942-50.
Score: 0.051
-
Breast MRI BI-RADS 3: Impact of Patient-Level Factors on Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Mar; 17(3):377-383.
Score: 0.034